12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      To Burn or Not to Burn? Effect of Management Strategy on North American Prairie Vegetation for Public Urban Areas in Germany

      research-article
      * ,
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          North American prairie vegetation has been a role model for designing highly attractive plantings for German urban green spaces for the past decade. In combination with gravel mulch top layers on planting sites and non-selective maintenance techniques like mowing or burning, prairie plantings are considered to be cost-effective and low-maintenance. This study was undertaken to assess the impact of different maintenance strategies and especially the necessity of fire management on the development success of ornamental prairie plantings in central Europe. A four factorial split-plot-block design was set up for investigation of different mixtures of prairie species under varying management conditions (mow-only, mowing plus selective weeding, mowing plus weeding and burning) on two differing soil types (in-situ topsoil and in-situ topsoil with a graywacke gravel mulch top layer) over three years. Significant effects of maintenance strategy on mortality rates and vitality were documented for a number of target species, which responded species specifically, either being slightly affected by the burning or thriving on it. Those effects were mostly restricted to topsoil sites. A strong impact on weed species presence and abundance and resulting maintenance times was found on both soil types. On topsoil sites, mow-only treatment resulted in a short-term loss of the original planting due to extensive weed growth. Corresponding gravel mulch sites were generally less colonised and visually dominated by weeds. Differences between weeded and weeded plus burned sites were minor. Unexpectedly, weed species populations were mostly unaffected by the additional burning treatment, while maintenance times and costs increased. No overall benefit of fire management for the establishment of prairie plantings was documented. The most effective management combination proved to be mowing plus regular selective weeding measures on gravel mulched planting sites.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie

          Species diversity has declined in ecosystems worldwide as a result of habitat fragmentation, eutrophication, and land-use change. If such decline is to be halted ecological mechanisms that restore or maintain biodiversity are needed. Two long-term field experiments were performed in native grassland to assess the effects of fire, nitrogen addition, and grazing or mowing on plant species diversity. In one experiment, richness declined on burned and fertilized treatments, whereas mowing maintained diversity under these conditions. In the second experiment, loss of species diversity due to frequent burning was reversed by bison, a keystone herbivore in North American grasslands. Thus, mowing or the reestablishment of grazing in anthropogenically stressed grasslands enhanced biodiversity.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Role: Editor
            Journal
            PLoS One
            PLoS ONE
            plos
            plosone
            PLoS ONE
            Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
            1932-6203
            2014
            6 October 2014
            : 9
            : 10
            : e108588
            Affiliations
            [1]Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Chair of Vegetation Technology and Planting Design, Berlin Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany
            California State University, Fresno, CA, United States of America
            Author notes

            Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

            Conceived and designed the experiments: AS NK. Performed the experiments: AS. Analyzed the data: AS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NK. Wrote the paper: AS NK.

            Article
            PONE-D-14-23951
            10.1371/journal.pone.0108588
            4186812
            25286061
            5631499d-6ce7-4122-b9f5-a3480e1b8400
            Copyright @ 2014

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            History
            : 3 June 2014
            : 22 August 2014
            Page count
            Pages: 11
            Funding
            This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) ( www.dfg.de). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
            Categories
            Research Article
            Biology and Life Sciences
            Ecology
            Ecosystems
            Urban Ecosystems
            Plant Ecology
            Plant Communities
            Plant-Environment Interactions
            Community Ecology
            Population Ecology
            Restoration Ecology
            Urban Ecology
            Ecology and Environmental Sciences
            Environmental Management
            Species Colonization
            Invasive Species

            Uncategorized
            Uncategorized

            Comments

            Comment on this article