33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pneumatic retinopexy. A two-year follow-up study of the multicenter clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling.

      Ophthalmology
      Cataract Extraction, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Prognosis, Reoperation, Retinal Detachment, surgery, Scleral Buckling, Visual Acuity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The authors report 2-year follow-up information on 179 of 198 eyes (90%) enrolled in a previously published multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy (PR) with scleral buckling (SB) for the management of selected retinal detachments. Scleral buckling was compared with PR with regard to redetachment after the initial 6-month follow-up period (1% versus 1%), overall attachment (98% versus 99%), subsequent cataract surgery (18% versus 4%; P less than 0.05), preoperative visual acuity (no significant difference), and final visual acuity of 20/50 or better in eyes with macular detachment for a period of 14 days or less (67% versus 89%; P less than or equal to 0.05). Reoperations after a failed PR attempt did not adversely affect visual outcome. After 2 years, PR continues to compare favorably with SB.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          1891222
          10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32168-7

          Chemistry
          Cataract Extraction,Follow-Up Studies,Humans,Postoperative Complications,Prognosis,Reoperation,Retinal Detachment,surgery,Scleral Buckling,Visual Acuity

          Comments

          Comment on this article