Infarto agudo do miocárdio complicado por choque cardiogênico: efeito da circulação colateral nos resultados da intervenção coronária percutânea primária - dados do registro InCor

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

INTRODUÇÃO: A presença de circulação colateral no contexto do infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM) pode exercer um fator de proteção, levando a menor área de infarto e melhor função ventricular. Este trabalho procurou examinar as características clínicas dos pacientes com diferentes graus de circulação colateral e a influência desta na evolução do IAM com supradesnivelamento de segmento ST (IAMCSST) complicado com choque cardiogênico à admissão hospitalar e tratados com intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) primária. MÉTODOS: Registro unicêntrico que realizou seguimento prospectivo no período de 2001 a 2009, incluindo 105 pacientes divididos em dois grupos, de acordo com o grau de circulação colateral: grupo 1, circulação colateral graus 0/1 (n = 83); e grupo 2, circulação colateral graus 2/3 (n = 22). As características clínicas e angiográficas e os desfechos hospitalares foram comparados entre os grupos. RESULTADOS: Ambos os grupos foram semelhantes em relação às características clínicas, exceto pela menor média de idade (65,9 anos vs. 57,8 anos; P = 0,015) e maior tendência ao tabagismo atual no grupo com colateral graus 2/3 (15,7% vs. 31,8%; P = 0,08). Quanto às características angiográficas, nos indivíduos com colateral graus 2/3 houve maior frequência de lesões/paciente (1,3 lesão vs. 1,8 lesão; P = 0,02) e maior acometimento de bifurcação coronária (18,5% vs. 36,4%; P = 0,03). Na evolução intra-hospitalar ficou evidenciada menor mortalidade nos pacientes com circulação colateral exuberante (49,4% vs. 27,3%, risco relativo de 0,55; P = 0,05). CONCLUSÕES: Em pacientes com IAMCSST e choque cardiogênico tratados com ICP primária a presença de circulação colateral pode favorecer um melhor prognóstico na evolução intra-hospitalar.

Translated abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of collateral circulation in the context of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may play a protective role, leading to smaller infarction areas and improved ventricular function. This study was aimed at assessing the clinical characteristics of patients with different degrees of collateral circulation and the effect on outcomes of ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock at hospital admission and treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Single center registry with a prospective follow-up from 2001 to 2009, including 105 patients divided into two groups, according to the degree of collateral circulation: Group 1, collateral circulation grades 0/1 (n = 83); and Group 2, collateral circulation grades 2/3 (n = 22). Clinical and angiographic characteristics and hospital outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of both groups were similar, except for a lower mean age (65.9 years vs. 57.8 years; P = 0.015) and a trend to current smoking in the grade 2/3 group (15.7% vs. 31.8%; P = 0.08). As to angiographic characteristics, individuals with grades 2/3 had a higher rate of lesions per patient (1.3 vs. 1.8; P = 0.02) and more bifurcation lesions (18.5% vs. 36.4%; P = 0.03). In-hospital outcomes showed lower mortality in patients with good collateral circulation (49.4% vs. 27.3%, relative risk 0.55; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock treated by primary PCI, the presence of collateral circulation may improve in-hospital prognosis.

Related collections

Most cited references 27

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Paula Hochman, Tina Sichrovsky, Nathan Every … (2005)

Early mechanical revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock is a therapeutic strategy that reduces mortality. It has been a class I recommendation in guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association since 1999 for patients younger than 75 years. However, little is known about implementation of these guidelines in practice. To assess trends in early revascularization and mortality for patients with cardiogenic shock complicating AMI and to determine whether the national guidelines affect revascularization rates. Prospective, observational study of 293,633 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (25,311 [8.6%] had cardiogenic shock; 7356 [29%] had cardiogenic shock at hospital presentation) enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) from January 1995 to May 2004 at 775 US hospitals with revascularization capability (defined as the capability to perform cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], and open-heart surgery). Management patterns and in-hospital mortality rates. There was an increase in primary PCI rates from 27.4% to 54.4% (P<.001) in hospitals with revascularization capability that paralleled the change in PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. There was no significant change in rates of immediate coronary artery bypass graft surgery (from 2.1% to 3.2%). Propensity-adjusted multivariable analyses demonstrated that primary PCI was associated with a decreased odds of death during hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.53). There were no differences in the rates of change in revascularization rates based on the date when the guidelines were released regardless of patient age. Overall in-hospital cardiogenic shock mortality decreased from 60.3% in 1995 to 47.9% in 2004 (P<.001). The use of PCI for patients with cardiogenic shock was associated with improved survival in a large group of hospitals with revascularization capability. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines had no detectable temporal impact on revascularization rates. These findings support the need for increased adherence to these guidelines.