0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex differences in the ventilatory responses to exercise in mild to moderate obesity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          New Findings

          • What is the central question of the study?

            What are the sex differences in ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with obesity?

          • What is the main finding and its importance?

            Tidal volume and expiratory flows are lower in females when compared with males at higher levels of ventilation despite small increases in end‐expiratory lung volumes. Since dyspnoea on exertion is a frequent complaint, particularly in females with obesity, careful attention should be paid to unpleasant respiratory symptoms and mechanical ventilatory constraints while prescribing exercise.

          Abstract

          Obesity is associated with altered ventilatory responses, which may be exacerbated in females due to the functional consequences of sex‐related morphological differences in the respiratory system. This study examined sex differences in ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with obesity. Healthy adults with obesity ( n = 73; 48 females) underwent pulmonary function testing, underwater weighing, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a graded exercise test to exhaustion, and two constant work rate exercise tests; one at a fixed work rate (60 W for females and 105 W for males) and one at a relative intensity (50% of peak oxygen uptake, V ˙ O 2 peak ). Metabolic, respiratory and perceptual responses were assessed during exercise. Compared with males, females used a smaller proportion of their ventilatory capacity at peak exercise (69.13 ± 14.49 vs. 77.41 ± 17.06% maximum voluntary ventilation, = 0.0374). Females also utilized a smaller proportion of their forced vital capacity (FVC) at peak exercise (tidal volume: 48.51 ± 9.29 vs. 54.12 ± 10.43%FVC, = 0.0218). End‐expiratory lung volumes were 2–4% higher in females compared with males during exercise ( < 0.05), while end‐inspiratory lung volumes were similar. Since the males were initiating inspiration from a lower lung volume, they experienced greater expiratory flow limitation during exercise. Ratings of perceived breathlessness during exercise were similar between females and males at comparable levels of ventilation. In summary, sex differences in the manifestations of obesity‐related mechanical ventilatory constraints were observed. Since dyspnoea on exertion is a common complaint in patients with obesity, particularly in females, exercise prescriptions should be tailored with the goal of minimizing unpleasant respiratory sensations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standardisation of spirometry.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

            G Borg (1982)
            There is a great demand for perceptual effort ratings in order to better understand man at work. Such ratings are important complements to behavioral and physiological measurements of physical performance and work capacity. This is true for both theoretical analysis and application in medicine, human factors, and sports. Perceptual estimates, obtained by psychophysical ratio-scaling methods, are valid when describing general perceptual variation, but category methods are more useful in several applied situations when differences between individuals are described. A presentation is made of ratio-scaling methods, category methods, especially the Borg Scale for ratings of perceived exertion, and a new method that combines the category method with ratio properties. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are discussed in both theoretical-psychophysical and psychophysiological frames of reference.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Dharini.Bhammar@osumc.edu
                Journal
                Exp Physiol
                Exp Physiol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-445X
                EPH
                expphysiol
                Experimental Physiology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0958-0670
                1469-445X
                17 July 2022
                01 August 2022
                : 107
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1113/eph.v107.8 )
                : 965-977
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas and UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
                [ 2 ] Center for Tobacco Research Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Health & Human Performance Texas A&M University ‐ Commerce Commerce TX USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Dharini M. Bhammar, Center for Tobacco Research, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, 3650 Olentangy River Road, Suite 420, Columbus OH, 43214, USA.

                Email: Dharini.Bhammar@ 123456osumc.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3358-2169
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2642-7083
                Article
                EPH13217
                10.1113/EP090309
                9357174
                35771362
                565c1bed-5170-4796-9bd8-fcf2582bafb4
                © 2022 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 04 January 2022
                : 20 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, Pages: 13, Words: 9150
                Funding
                Funded by: NIH , doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: R01 HL096782‐01A2
                Funded by: King Charitable Foundation Trust
                Funded by: Cain Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100002773;
                Funded by: Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Papers
                Respiratory
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                1 August 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:07.10.2022

                Anatomy & Physiology
                breathing limitations,dynamic hyperinflation,dyspnoea,expiratory flow limitation,operating lung volumes

                Comments

                Comment on this article