Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

The relationship between organisational characteristics and the effects of clinical guidelines on medical performance in hospitals, a meta-analysis

Read this article at

Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 76

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.

      Major difficulties arise when introducing evidence and clinical guidelines into routine daily practice. Data show that many patients do not receive appropriate care, or receive unnecessary or harmful care. Many approaches claim to offer solutions to this problem; which ones are as yet the most effective and efficient is unclear. We aim to provide an overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice. Substantial evidence suggests that to change behaviour is possible, but this change generally requires comprehensive approaches at different levels (doctor, team practice, hospital, wider environment), tailored to specific settings and target groups. Plans for change should be based on characteristics of the evidence or guideline itself and barriers and facilitators to change. In general, evidence shows that none of the approaches for transferring evidence to practice is superior to all changes in all situations.
        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS OF DETERMINANTS AND MODERATORS.

         F. Damanpour (1991)
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.

          Throughout history, doctor-patient relationships have been acknowledged as having an important therapeutic effect, irrespective of any prescribed drug or treatment. We did a systematic review to determine whether there was any empirical evidence to support this theory. A comprehensive search strategy was developed to include 11 medical, psychological, and sociological electronic databases. The quality of eligible trials was objectively assessed by two reviewers, and the type of non-treatment care given in each trial was categorised as cognitive or emotional. Cognitive care aims to influence patients' expectations about the illness or the treatment, whereas emotional care refers to the style of the consultation (eg, warm, empathic), and aims to reduce negative feelings such as anxiety and fear. We identified 25 eligible randomised controlled trials. 19 examined the effects of influencing patients' expectations about treatment, half of which found significant effects. None of the studies examined the effects of emotional care alone, but four trials assessed a combination of both cognitive and emotional care. Three of these studies showed that enhancing patients' expectations through positive information about the treatment or the illness, while providing support or reassurance, significantly influenced health outcomes. There is much inconsistency regarding emotional and cognitive care, although one relatively consistent finding is that physicians who adopt a warm, friendly, and reassuring manner are more effective than those who keep consultations formal and do not offer reassurance.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            [1 ]Centre for Quality of Care Research-117, Radboud University, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
            [2 ]Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
            [3 ]Ottawa Health Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada
            Contributors
            Journal
            BMC Health Serv Res
            BMC Health Services Research
            BioMed Central (London )
            1472-6963
            2006
            28 April 2006
            : 6
            : 53
            1479332
            1472-6963-6-53
            16646968
            10.1186/1472-6963-6-53
            Copyright © 2006 Dijkstra et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

            This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

            Categories
            Research Article

            Health & Social care

            Comments

            Comment on this article