3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cumulative Exposure to Frequent Intradialytic Hypotension Associates With New-Onset Dementia Among Elderly Hemodialysis Patients

      brief-report
      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 ,
      Kidney International Reports
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: Cognitive impairment, including dementia, affects up to 70% of individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis, 1 a prevalence that exceeds that of the elderly general population by 3- to 7-fold. 2 Cardiometabolic risk factors for dementia, such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and vascular disease, are highly prevalent in end-stage kidney disease. 3 However, the rate of new-onset dementia is higher among hemodialysis patients compared with peritoneal dialysis patients, 4 suggesting that aspects of the hemodialysis procedure may contribute to the development of dementia. Imaging studies show that hemodialysis can cause significant circulatory stress via ultrafiltration-induced hypoperfusion of vital vascular beds, including the brain. 5 Maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion during dialysis is dependent on intradialytic blood pressure and the brain’s intrinsic ability to preserve relatively constant blood flow despite changes in perfusion pressure. Hemodialysis patients may be particularly susceptible to the neurologic consequences of dialysis-induced blood pressure declines due, in part, to diminished autoregulatory capacity from autonomic and endothelial dysfunction.6, 7 It is thus plausible that repeated exposure to intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and associated cerebral hypoperfusion may increase dementia risk. In fact, general population data indicate that orthostatic hypotension 8 as well as cerebral hypoperfusion 9 are associated with accelerated cognitive decline and a higher risk of new-onset dementia. Although a recent study found an association between IDH and reversible cognitive decline in the immediate post-dialysis period, 10 the relationship between long-term, cumulative IDH exposure and the development of dementia in the hemodialysis population has not been established. The objective of our study was to examine the association between the cumulative exposure to frequent IDH and the 5-year risk of new-onset dementia among elderly individuals initiating maintenance hemodialysis at a large U.S. dialysis organization. After a 30-day lag period following hemodialysis initiation, we determined if patients experienced frequent IDH in successive 90-day exposure intervals (Supplementary Figure S1). Within a given exposure interval, we classified an individual as having frequent IDH if he or she experienced a nadir intradialytic systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg in at least 30% of hemodialysis treatments. This IDH definition has been associated with all-cause mortality, an important competing event in our analysis. 11 We evaluated the association between the time-updated, cumulative number of exposure intervals with frequent IDH after dialysis initiation and new-onset dementia using marginal structural Fine and Gray proportional subdistribution hazards models. All-cause death was treated as a competing event. A total of 31,055 individuals initiated maintenance hemodialysis from June 1, 2005, to October 1, 2013, and met study selection criteria (Supplementary Table S1). The study cohort had an average age of 76.0 ± 6.6 years, 46.2% were women, 19.9% were black, 8.7% were Hispanic, and the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease was diabetes (43.7%). Baseline cardiovascular comorbid conditions were common: 39.9% of the cohort had an arrhythmia or conduction disorder, 59.2% had heart failure, 56.0% had ischemic heart disease, 29.1% had peripheral arterial disease and 18.8% had a history of stroke (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2). Table 1 Select characteristics of the study cohort at baseline Characteristic Total study population (N = 31,055) Age at dialysis initiation, yr 76.0 ± 6.6 Female 14,359 (46.2) Race  Black 6179 (19.9)  White 23,356 (75.2)  Other 1520 (4.9) Hispanic 2705 (8.7) Cause of end-stage kidney disease  Diabetes 13,565 (43.7)  Hypertension 11,636 (37.5)  Glomerular disease 1742 (5.6)  Other 4112 (13.2) Current smoker at dialysis initiation 1090 (3.5) Inpatient dialysis initiation 13,054 (42.0) Vascular access  Catheter 22,398 (72.1)  Fistula 6580 (21.2)  Graft 2077 (6.7) Arrhythmia or conduction disorder 12,393 (39.9) Diabetes 20,379 (65.6) Dyslipidemia 9972 (32.1) Heart failure 18,370 (59.2) Ischemic heart disease 17,398 (56.0) Peripheral arterial disease 9046 (29.1) Stroke 5834 (18.8) Valvular disease 2464 (7.9) Pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure, mm Hg  ≤130 8475 (27.3)  131–150 12,240 (39.4)  151–170 7736 (24.9)  ≥171 2604 (8.4) Values are given as number (percent) for categorical variables and as mean ± SD for continuous variables. Baseline covariates, including demographics, comorbid conditions, and health care utilization metrics were obtained in the 365 days preceding dialysis initiation. Baseline laboratory and dialysis treatment-related covariates were obtained in the 30 days immediately after dialysis initiation. The complete list of study cohort baseline characteristics is displayed in Supplementary Table S2. The cohort was followed for a total of 64,982 person-years and had an average follow-up duration of 2.1 ± 1.6 years. During the 5-year follow-up period, 4991 individuals developed all-cause dementia (incidence rate = 7.7 cases of new-onset dementia/100 person-years) and 11,037 individuals died (incidence rate = 17.0 deaths/100 person-years). Greater cumulative exposure to frequent IDH after hemodialysis initiation was incrementally associated with a higher 5-year risk of new-onset dementia (Figure 1). Individuals who experienced frequent IDH in ≥ 7 (vs. zero) 90-day exposure intervals across time had the highest 5-year risk of new-onset dementia (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.36 [1.20–1.48]). Figure 1 Association between time-updated, cumulative exposure to frequent intradialytic hypotension and the 5-year risk of new-onset dementia. We used marginal structural Fine and Gray proportional subdistribution hazard models, treating death as a competing event, to estimate association between the time-updated, cumulative exposure to frequent intradialytic hypotension and the 5-year risk of new-onset dementia. Within a given 90-day exposure interval, we classified an individual as having frequent intradialytic hypotension if he or she experienced a nadir intradialytic systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg in at least 30% of hemodialysis treatments. Supplementary Table S3 contains outcome and competing event definitions. We used inverse probability of exposure weighting to adjust for baseline and time-updated covariates listed in Supplementary Table S4. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. We provide initial evidence linking cumulative IDH exposure to new-onset dementia among individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Prior mechanistic studies have shown that hemodialysis-induced circulatory stress may contribute to the development of cerebral ischemic injury, but these studies were not powered to consider clinical outcomes. For example, in a cross-sectional study of 12 elderly hemodialysis patients from the Netherlands, Polinder-Bos et al. 5 demonstrated that hemodialysis induces a significant reduction in global and regional cerebral blood flow. In a pilot study of 58 prevalent hemodialysis patients from the United Kingdom, MacEwen et al. 12 found that more pronounced declines in intradialytic mean arterial pressure associated with a higher incidence of intradialytic cerebral ischemic episodes. Furthermore, in a prospective cohort study of 32 nondiabetic, Japanese hemodialysis patients, Mizumasa et al. 13 noted that the number of IDH episodes (defined as a fall in systolic blood pressure >50 mm Hg within 30 minutes of starting hemodialysis plus associated symptoms of hypoperfusion) across time was weakly correlated with greater cerebral frontal lobe atrophy. Our findings extend this mechanistic evidence by linking frequent IDH to the clinical outcome of new-onset dementia. Dementia is associated with a range of adverse outcomes, including lower quality of life 14 and treatment nonadherence, 15 as well as higher hospitalization and mortality rates.16, 17 Therefore, identification of effective interventions that reduce dementia risk is needed to improve patient outcomes. One promising hemodialysis-based intervention may be the use of cooled dialysate. Cooled dialysate reduces intradialytic hemodynamic instability, 18 likely via cold-induced vasoconstriction and associated improvements in systemic vascular resistance during ultrafiltration. In a randomized controlled trial of 73 incident hemodialysis patients from the United Kingdom, Eldehni et al. 19 found that hemodialysis with cooled dialysate (0.5°C below core body temperature) versus standard temperature dialysate (37°C) led to preservation of brain white matter microstructure at 1 year. This relatively low-risk intervention may be a viable, low-cost neuroprotective treatment strategy for individuals initiating hemodialysis. Other potential IDH reduction strategies include treatment time extension, more frequent dialysis, and ultrafiltration profiling, but supporting data, particularly with regard to the latter, are limited. In conclusion, we found that increased cumulative exposure to frequent IDH after dialysis initiation was incrementally associated with a higher 5-year risk of new-onset dementia in a cohort of more than 30,000 elderly hemodialysis patients. Interventional studies are needed to determine if IDH mitigation reduces dementia risk among individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Disclosure MMA and JEF received investigator-initiated research funding from the Renal Research Institute, a subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care, North America. JEF received speaking honoraria from American Renal Associates, American Society of Nephrology, Dialysis Clinic, Incorporated, National Kidney Foundation, and multiple universities; consulting fees from Fresenius Medical Care, North America; and serves on the medical advisory board to NxStage Medical. LW declared no competing interests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chronic kidney disease: effects on the cardiovascular system.

          Accelerated cardiovascular disease is a frequent complication of renal disease. Chronic kidney disease promotes hypertension and dyslipidemia, which in turn can contribute to the progression of renal failure. Furthermore, diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of renal failure in developed countries. Together, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes are major risk factors for the development of endothelial dysfunction and progression of atherosclerosis. Inflammatory mediators are often elevated and the renin-angiotensin system is frequently activated in chronic kidney disease, which likely contributes through enhanced production of reactive oxygen species to the accelerated atherosclerosis observed in chronic kidney disease. Promoters of calcification are increased and inhibitors of calcification are reduced, which favors metastatic vascular calcification, an important participant in vascular injury associated with end-stage renal disease. Accelerated atherosclerosis will then lead to increased prevalence of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Consequently, subjects with chronic renal failure are exposed to increased morbidity and mortality as a result of cardiovascular events. Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease are major considerations in the management of individuals with chronic kidney disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Comparison of the Prevalence of Dementia in the United States in 2000 and 2012

            The aging of the US population is expected to lead to a large increase in the number of adults with dementia, but some recent studies in the United States and other high-income countries suggest that the age-specific risk of dementia may have declined over the past 25 years. Clarifying current and future population trends in dementia prevalence and risk has important implications for patients, families, and government programs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of mortality risk with various definitions of intradialytic hypotension.

              Intradialytic hypotension is a serious and frequent complication of hemodialysis; however, there is no evidence-based consensus definition of intradialytic hypotension. As a result, coherent evaluation of the effects of intradialytic hypotension is difficult. We analyzed data from 1409 patients in the HEMO Study and 10,392 patients from a single large dialysis organization to investigate the associations of commonly used intradialytic hypotension definitions and mortality. Intradialytic hypotension definitions were selected a priori on the basis of literature review. For each definition, patients were characterized as having intradialytic hypotension if they met the corresponding definition in at least 30% of baseline exposure period treatments or characterized as control otherwise. Overall and within subgroups of patients with predialysis systolic BP<120 or 120-159 mmHg, an absolute nadir systolic BP<90 mmHg was most potently associated with mortality. Within the subgroup of patients with predialysis BP≥160 mmHg, nadir BP<100 mmHg was most potently associated with mortality. Intradialytic hypotension definitions that considered symptoms, interventions, and decreases in BP during dialysis were not associated with outcome, and when added to nadir BP, symptom and intervention criteria did not accentuate associations with mortality. Our results suggest that nadir-based definitions best capture the association between intradialytic hypotension and mortality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney International Reports
                Elsevier
                2468-0249
                14 January 2019
                April 2019
                14 January 2019
                : 4
                : 4
                : 603-606
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [3 ]Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence: Jennifer E. Flythe, University of North Carolina Kidney Center, 7024 Burnett-Womack CB #7155, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599–7155, USA. jflythe@ 123456med.unc.edu
                Article
                S2468-0249(19)30006-3
                10.1016/j.ekir.2019.01.001
                6451081
                30993235
                567dd64d-eb57-44bf-8163-291ba2189788
                © 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 27 November 2018
                : 3 January 2019
                : 4 January 2019
                Categories
                Research Letter

                Comments

                Comment on this article