26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Air Pollution and Heat Exposure With Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight, and Stillbirth in the US : A Systematic Review

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , , MD 2 , , PhD 3 , 4 , , MD, MSHP 5
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic review summarizes the association of climate change, including heat, ozone, and fine particulate matter, with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth, in the US.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are increases in air pollutant or heat exposure related to climate change associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth, in the US?

          Findings

          In this systematic review of 57 of 68 studies including a total of 32 798 152 births, there was a statistically significant association between heat, ozone, or fine particulate matter and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Heterogeneous studies from across the US revealed positive findings in each analysis of exposure and outcome.

          Meaning

          The findings suggest that exacerbation of air pollution and heat exposure related to climate change may be significantly associated with risk to pregnancy outcomes in the US.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Knowledge of whether serious adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with increasingly widespread effects of climate change in the US would be crucial for the obstetrical medical community and for women and families across the country.

          Objective

          To investigate prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5), ozone, and heat, and the association of these factors with preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth.

          Evidence Review

          This systematic review involved a comprehensive search for primary literature in Cochrane Library, Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov website, and MEDLINE. Qualifying primary research studies included human participants in US populations that were published in English between January 1, 2007, and April 30, 2019. Included articles analyzed the associations between air pollutants or heat and obstetrical outcomes. Comparative observational cohort studies and cross-sectional studies with comparators were included, without minimum sample size. Additional articles found through reference review were also considered. Articles analyzing other obstetrical outcomes, non-US populations, and reviews were excluded. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility. The Arskey and O’Malley scoping review framework was used. Data extraction was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

          Findings

          Of the 1851 articles identified, 68 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 32 798 152 births were analyzed, with a mean (SD) of 565 485 (783 278) births per study. A total of 57 studies (48 of 58 [84%] on air pollutants; 9 of 10 [90%] on heat) showed a significant association of air pollutant and heat exposure with birth outcomes. Positive associations were found across all US geographic regions. Exposure to PM 2.5 or ozone was associated with increased risk of preterm birth in 19 of 24 studies (79%) and low birth weight in 25 of 29 studies (86%). The subpopulations at highest risk were persons with asthma and minority groups, especially black mothers. Accurate comparisons of risk were limited by differences in study design, exposure measurement, population demographics, and seasonality.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This review suggests that increasingly common environmental exposures exacerbated by climate change are significantly associated with serious adverse pregnancy outcomes across the US.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.

          Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the 'scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for 'reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed, or exhibits a complex or heterogeneous nature not amenable to a more precise systematic review of the evidence. While scoping reviews may be conducted to determine the value and probable scope of a full systematic review, they may also be undertaken as exercises in and of themselves to summarize and disseminate research findings, to identify research gaps, and to make recommendations for the future research. This article briefly introduces the reader to scoping reviews, how they are different to systematic reviews, and why they might be conducted. The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the Joanna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Heat Stroke

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Insights into the mechanisms and mediators of the effects of air pollution exposure on blood pressure and vascular function in healthy humans.

              Fine particulate matter air pollution plus ozone impairs vascular function and raises diastolic blood pressure. We aimed to determine the mechanism and air pollutant responsible. The effects of pollution on heart rate variability, blood pressure, biomarkers, and brachial flow-mediated dilatation were determined in 2 randomized, double-blind, crossover studies. In Ann Arbor, 50 subjects were exposed to fine particles (150 microg/m(3)) plus ozone (120 parts per billion) for 2 hours on 3 occasions with pretreatments of an endothelin antagonist (Bosentan, 250 mg), antioxidant (Vitamin C, 2 g), or placebo. In Toronto, 31 subjects were exposed to 4 different conditions (particles plus ozone, particles, ozone, and filtered air). In Toronto, diastolic blood pressure significantly increased (2.9 and 3.6 mm Hg) only during particle-containing exposures in association with particulate matter concentration and reductions in heart rate variability. Flow-mediated dilatation significantly decreased (2.0% and 2.9%) only 24 hours after particle-containing exposures in association with particulate matter concentration and increases in blood tumor necrosis factor alpha. In Ann Arbor, diastolic blood pressure significantly similarly increased during all of the exposures (2.5 to 4.0 mm Hg), a response not mitigated by pretreatments. Flow-mediated dilatation remained unaltered. Particulate matter, not ozone, was responsible for increasing diastolic blood pressure during air pollution inhalation, most plausibly by instigating acute autonomic imbalance. Only particles from urban Toronto additionally impaired endothelial function, likely via slower proinflammatory pathways. Our findings demonstrate credible mechanisms whereby fine particulate matter could trigger acute cardiovascular events and that aspects of exposure location may be an important determinant of the health consequences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                18 June 2020
                June 2020
                18 June 2020
                : 3
                : 6
                : e208243
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Retired from Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego
                [2 ]The University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston
                [3 ]California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air and Climate Epidemiology Section, Oakland
                [4 ]Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley
                [5 ]George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 8, 2020.
                Published: June 18, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8243
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Bekkar B et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Bruce Bekkar, MD, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 127 Spinnaker Ct, Del Mar, CA 92014 ( greendoc@ 123456me.com ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Bekkar and DeNicola had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: All authors.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Bekkar, Pacheco, DeNicola.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Bekkar, Pacheco, DeNicola.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pacheco, Basu, DeNicola.
                Statistical analysis: Bekkar.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Bekkar, Pacheco, DeNicola.
                Supervision: Bekkar, DeNicola.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Additional Contributions: Mary Hyde, MSLS (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists), and Paul Bielman, MLIS (Kaiser Permanente San Diego), assisted with the database searches. These individuals were not financially compensated for this work.
                Article
                zoi200351
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8243
                7303808
                32556259
                56ef6137-b477-477f-bb35-a61a57a9095b
                Copyright 2020 Bekkar B et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 17 January 2020
                : 8 April 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Environmental Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article