14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities.

      Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics
      Case-Control Studies, Cephalometry, Facial Asymmetry, classification, etiology, pathology, radiography, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, methods, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Mandible, abnormalities, Maxillofacial Abnormalities, complications, Prognathism, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aims of this study were to characterize the symmetrical features of patients with facial deformities and to suggest a classification system for facial asymmetry based on 3-dimensional-computed tomography (3D-CT) evaluation. Preoperative CT images were investigated for 49 patients with maxillofacial deformities. Asymmetry indices were calculated for some landmarks in the maxilla, mandibular body and the mandibular ramus regions. Asymmetry was observed most frequently in the mandibular body region. The subjects were divided into 3 groups. Subjects without any asymmetry in the 3 regions were classified as Group I (44.9%). Groups II or III were defined for subjects without or with maxillary region asymmetry, respectively, and they were subcategorized. In Group IIA (8.2%), asymmetry was shown solely in the mandibular body region, and in Group IIB (18.4%), additional asymmetry was shown in the mandibular ramus region. Group IIIA (6.1%) showed asymmetry only in the maxillary region, and Group IIIB (22.4%) showed asymmetry in all 3 regions. The 3D-CT classification for facial asymmetry has the potential to replace the conventional cephalometric classification.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article