11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Horn today, gone tomorrow—dehorning as an anti-poaching practice for white rhinos

      research-article
      Conservation Physiology
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since the beginning of the 20th century, rhino populations have declined from 500 000 individuals to just 27 000. That means they are at just 5% of their population size since 1900! With increasing poaching pressure driven by a demand for rhino horn, the national parks and private reserves that are integral to the remaining rhinos’ survival often need on-the-ground security to protect them. But this type of protection can be expensive. As an alternative, some reserves in South Africa have turned to dehorning—a veterinary procedure that removes a portion of the rhino’shorn. But should managers worry that dehorning causes stress that could impact the welfare of the rhinos? This question is particularly pressing because when managers use dehorning as an anti-poaching tactic, they must trim the rhino’s horns every 1–3 years over its lifetime. Each time the procedure is performed, the rhino needs to be tranquilized. This repetition is necessary because the horns are made of keratin, the same material found in fingernails, claws and hooves. And just like those structures, rhino horns grow continuously. Researchers at the University of Brighton investigated whether the dehorning procedure causes long-term stress for wild white rhinos by analysing hormones in their faeces before and after the procedures. They measured stress hormones called glucocorticoids, which have been shown to rise when rhinos are faced with stressors such as translocation or captivity. They also measured reproductive hormones, which tend to be suppressed under conditions of stress. If the physiology of the rhinos is impacted, it could mean they will face issues when they try to mate and produce offspring. The rhinos in the study were darted from a helicopter and stabilized before having both of their horns trimmed, which is no easy task! The veterinary team must use a chainsaw to remove the horn material and then smooth the edges with a disc sander. They then reverse the effects of the anaesthetic to allow the rhinos to fully recover. This entire process takes about 15–20 minutes. Penny et al. (2020) found that dehorning did not cause a long-term elevation in stress hormone levels compared with rhinos who had not undergone the procedure. They also showed that repeatedly dehorning over multiple years did not lead to increased stress hormone levels or the suppression of reproductive hormones in either male or female rhinos. The researchers outline that further studies are needed to monitor the behaviour of rhinos after dehorning and to confirm that the procedure does not impact rhinos differently in other geographic areas or habitat types. Still, these results are encouraging. Dehorning is considered a relatively drastic measure, and so knowing that the rhinos’ physiology is not negatively affected by these procedures can help managers feel more confident about choosing it as an anti-poaching measure when the pressure to protect the rhinos’ safety is so high. Illustration by Erin Walsh; Email: ewalsh.sci@gmail.com Editor: Jodie L. Rummer

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Negligible hormonal response following dehorning in free-ranging white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum )

          Private reserves and national parks in southern Africa are increasingly dehorning their rhinos. This study monitored changes in the faecal hormone metabolites of white rhinos subject to this procedure. The findings indicate that dehorning had a negligible impact on hormone metabolite profiles and that dehorning did not cause a long-term physiological stress response in rhinos.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Conserv Physiol
            Conserv Physiol
            conphys
            Conservation Physiology
            Oxford University Press
            2051-1434
            2021
            29 March 2021
            29 March 2021
            : 9
            : 1
            : coab012
            Affiliations
            [1] Carleton University , 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
            Author notes
            * Corresponding author: Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. Tel: +1 519 253 3000 x3751. Email: cmadliger@ 123456gmail.com
            Article
            coab012
            10.1093/conphys/coab012
            8009550
            571ba202-3fe2-4556-8d08-163e4a3529db
            © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

            This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

            History
            : 9 February 2021
            : 12 February 2021
            Page count
            Pages: 02
            Categories
            AcademicSubjects/SCI00840
            Conservation Physiology in Action

            Comments

            Comment on this article