11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      ST2249-MRSA-III: a second major recombinant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone causing healthcare infection in the 1970s.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Typing of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Australia in the 1970s revealed a novel clone, ST2249-MRSA-III (CC45), present from 1973 to 1979. This clone was present before the Australian epidemic caused by the recombinant clone, ST239-MRSA-III. This study aimed to characterize the genome of ST2249-MRSA-III to establish its relationship to other MRSA clones. DNA microarray analysis was conducted and a draft genome sequence of ST2249 was obtained. The recombinant structure of the ST2249 genome was revealed by comparisons to publicly available ST239 and ST45 genomes. Microarray analysis of genomic DNA of 13 ST2249 isolates showed gross similarities with the ST239 chromosome in a segment around the origin of replication and with ST45 for the remainder of the chromosome. Recombination breakpoints were precisely determined by the changing pattern of nucleotide polymorphisms in the genome sequence of ST2249 isolate SK1585 compared with ST239 and ST45. One breakpoint was identified to the right of oriC, between sites 1014 and 1065 of the gene D484_00045. Another was identified to the left of oriC, between sites 1185 and 1248 of D484_01632. These results indicate that ST2249 inherited approximately 35.3% of its chromosome from an ST239-like parent and 64.7% from an ST45-like parent. ST2249-MRSA-III resulted from a major recombination between parents that resemble ST239 and ST45. Although only limited Australian archival material is available, the oldest extant isolate of ST2249 predates the oldest Australian isolate of ST239 by 3 years. It is therefore plausible that these two recombinant clones were introduced into Australia separately.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin. Microbiol. Infect.
          Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
          Elsevier BV
          1469-0691
          1198-743X
          May 2015
          : 21
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Pathology Queensland Central Laboratory, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia. Electronic address: Graeme.Nimmo@health.qld.gov.au.
          [2 ] Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, University of Queensland, Qld, Australia.
          [3 ] Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany; Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
          [4 ] Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany.
          [5 ] Department of Microbiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA; Department of Biology, University of Bolton, Bolton, United Kingdom.
          [6 ] Queensland Medical Laboratory, Murrarie, Qld, Australia.
          [7 ] Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.
          [8 ] Department of Microbiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
          [9 ] Australian Collaborating Centre for Enterococcus and Staphylococcus Species (ACCESS) Typing and Research, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; Pathwest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
          Article
          S1198-743X(14)00171-2 NIHMS666531
          10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.018
          4564996
          25708549
          5726c0dc-a3cb-4dbf-87cc-2e2af7913156
          History

          recombination,ST2249,methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,Staphylococcus aureus,Australia,genome sequence

          Comments

          Comment on this article