There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
There is a need to evaluate different nursing procedures to determine whether in today's
cost-conscious climate of health care they genuinely benefit the patient. If such
procedures are indeed found to be of value, ways must be explored of ensuring that
the manner in which they are performed conforms to acceptable standards. In the study
reported here eyecare for the ventilated, sedated patient was examined because variations
in clinical practice had been observed and a preliminary examination of the literature
indicated that this patient group was at particular risks of developing serious ocular
complications. The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 took the form of a literature
review which demonstrated that although many questions remained unanswered, sufficient
information relating to eyecare existed to help develop protocols to guide care. Phase
2 consisted of non-participant observation with 15 nurses employed in an intensive
care unit to examine the standard of eyecare actually delivered. The standard of eyecare
fell short of the ideal and as in other studies designed to observe nursing procedures
accurately and in detail, there was no demonstrable relationship between clinical
practice, knowledge or clinical experience. From the study overall it was possible
to conclude that patients would benefit from the implementation and audit of guidelines
of eyecare but that before these innovations are undertaken barriers to good practice
should be explored in intensive care units.