30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contact-Based Methods for Measuring Respiratory Rate

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is an ever-growing demand for measuring respiratory variables during a variety of applications, including monitoring in clinical and occupational settings, and during sporting activities and exercise. Special attention is devoted to the monitoring of respiratory rate because it is a vital sign, which responds to a variety of stressors. There are different methods for measuring respiratory rate, which can be classed as contact-based or contactless. The present paper provides an overview of the currently available contact-based methods for measuring respiratory rate. For these methods, the sensing element (or part of the instrument containing it) is attached to the subject’s body. Methods based upon the recording of respiratory airflow, sounds, air temperature, air humidity, air components, chest wall movements, and modulation of the cardiac activity are presented. Working principles, metrological characteristics, and applications in the respiratory monitoring field are presented to explore potential development and applicability for each method.

          Related collections

          Most cited references226

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Micromachined inertial sensors

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: methodological review.

            Recent demand and interest in wireless, mobile-based healthcare has driven significant interest towards developing alternative biopotential electrodes for patient physiological monitoring. The conventional wet adhesive Ag/AgCl electrodes used almost universally in clinical applications today provide an excellent signal but are cumbersome and irritating for mobile use. While electrodes that operate without gels, adhesives and even skin contact have been known for many decades, they have yet to achieve any acceptance for medical use. In addition, detailed knowledge and comparisons between different electrodes are not well known in the literature. In this paper, we explore the use of dry/noncontact electrodes for clinical use by first explaining the electrical models for dry, insulated and noncontact electrodes and show the performance limits, along with measured data. The theory and data show that the common practice of minimizing electrode resistance may not always be necessary and actually lead to increased noise depending on coupling capacitance. Theoretical analysis is followed by an extensive review of the latest dry electrode developments in the literature. The paper concludes with highlighting some of the novel systems that dry electrode technology has enabled for cardiac and neural monitoring followed by a discussion of the current challenges and a roadmap going forward.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Humidity Sensors Principle, Mechanism, and Fabrication Technologies: A Comprehensive Review

              Humidity measurement is one of the most significant issues in various areas of applications such as instrumentation, automated systems, agriculture, climatology and GIS. Numerous sorts of humidity sensors fabricated and developed for industrial and laboratory applications are reviewed and presented in this article. The survey frequently concentrates on the RH sensors based upon their organic and inorganic functional materials, e.g., porous ceramics (semiconductors), polymers, ceramic/polymer and electrolytes, as well as conduction mechanism and fabrication technologies. A significant aim of this review is to provide a distinct categorization pursuant to state of the art humidity sensor types, principles of work, sensing substances, transduction mechanisms, and production technologies. Furthermore, performance characteristics of the different humidity sensors such as electrical and statistical data will be detailed and gives an added value to the report. By comparison of overall prospects of the sensors it was revealed that there are still drawbacks as to efficiency of sensing elements and conduction values. The flexibility offered by thick film and thin film processes either in the preparation of materials or in the choice of shape and size of the sensor structure provides advantages over other technologies. These ceramic sensors show faster response than other types.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                21 February 2019
                February 2019
                : 19
                : 4
                : 908
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unit of Measurements and Biomedical Instrumentation, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy; d.lopresti@ 123456unicampus.it (D.L.P.); s.silvestri@ 123456unicampus.it (S.S.); e.schena@ 123456unicampus.it (E.S.)
                [2 ]Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy; andrea.nicolo@ 123456yahoo.com (A.N.); massimo.sacchetti@ 123456uniroma4.it (M.S.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: c.massaroni@ 123456unicampus.it ; Tel.: +39-062-2541-9650
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-5623
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4716-1667
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1507-231X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-5161
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-8336
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9696-1265
                Article
                sensors-19-00908
                10.3390/s19040908
                6413190
                30795595
                575a9285-d8b6-4565-b2d4-fbbd72ffe5cb
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 04 January 2019
                : 17 February 2019
                Categories
                Review

                Biomedical engineering
                sensors,respiratory frequency,measurement,wearable,contact-based
                Biomedical engineering
                sensors, respiratory frequency, measurement, wearable, contact-based

                Comments

                Comment on this article