11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relationships between Land Management Scale and Livelihood Strategy Selection of Rural Households in China from the Perspective of Family Life Cycle

      , , , , , ,
      Land
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rural households are micro-organizational systems that are composed of different family members. Against a background of fragmented land patterns and massive labor migration in China, it is of great significance for the sustainable development of regional economies to explore the optimal selection of livelihood strategies by rural households. Using a survey containing data from 8031 rural households from 27 provinces in China, this study analyzed the characteristics and spatial distribution trends of the land management scale, family life cycle, and livelihood strategy selection of rural households, and constructed Tobit econometric models to explore the correlations among these factors. The results show: (1) Rural households’ land management scale was primarily small-scale and, as it expanded, the proportion of the total cash income coming from agricultural activities increased. A relative majority of rural households were in the middle period of the family life cycle, and relatively few rural households were in the starting and empty nest periods. The proportion of the total cash income of rural households coming from agricultural pursuits while in the stable and the empty nest periods was relatively large, reaching 40.51% and 38.92%, respectively. In most provinces sampled, rural households’ livelihood strategies were non-agriculturally based, and the land management scale was mainly less than 0.67 ha. (2) Rural households’ land management scale positively correlated with their livelihood strategy selection. When other conditions remained unchanged, with every 1 ha increase in land management scale, the proportion of agricultural cash income in total family cash income increased, on average, by 3.7%. In comparison with rural households in the empty nest period, the proportions of agricultural cash income in the total family cash income of rural households in other family life cycles were relatively small. Specifically, for rural households in the starting, rearing, burden, stable, and maintenance periods, the proportion of agricultural cash income in the total family cash income decreased, on average, by 6.8%, 6.7%, 9.2%, 3.5%, and 16.3%, respectively.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The family life cycle: Needed extensions of the concept

          Hohn (1987)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Arable land operation scale, family life cycle and rural households’ livelihood strategies

            Zhao (2019)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An impact analysis of family life cycle on rural labor return: Based on a survey of Fujian Rural Area

              Lin (2011)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Land
                Land
                MDPI AG
                2073-445X
                January 2020
                January 02 2020
                : 9
                : 1
                : 11
                Article
                10.3390/land9010011
                575c9d39-4c4c-4556-a870-e12d1758f0a6
                © 2020

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article