19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adding Tibial Tuberosity Medialization to Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Reduces Lateral Patellar Maltracking During Multidirectional Motion in a Computational Simulation Model

      research-article
      , Ph.D. a , , , M.D. b , , M.D., Ph.D. c
      Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To determine whether adding tibial tuberosity medialization to medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction reduces lateral patellar maltracking during a dynamic multidirectional activity and to investigate when medial patellofemoral contact pressures are elevated during daily activities, such as squatting.

          Methods

          Seven computational models representing knees with patellar instability, including lateral patellar maltracking, were evaluated following simulated MPFL reconstruction (bisect offset index > .75). Tibial tuberosity medialization was added to MPFL reconstruction for each model. Patellar tracking during multidirectional motion was evaluated by simulating pivot landing. Analysis of pivoting focused on early flexion (5° to 40°). Patellofemoral contact pressures during daily function were evaluated by simulating knee squatting. Data were analyzed with paired comparisons between MPFL reconstruction with and without tuberosity medialization.

          Results

          The patella dislocated during pivoting for 2 models with an isolated MPFL reconstruction and for 1 model including tibial tuberosity medialization. Adding tibial tuberosity medialization to MPFL reconstruction significantly decreased bisect offset index by ∼0.1 from 5° to 40° ( P < .03). For knee squatting, medializing the tibial tuberosity significantly increased maximum medial contract pressure by ∼0.5 MPa from 30° to 85° ( P < .05) but did not significantly influence maximum lateral pressure.

          Conclusions

          In this study of simulated multidirectional motion, MPFL reconstruction did not sufficiently constrain the patella for some knees. Adding tibial tuberosity medialization to MPFL reconstruction in these models reduced lateral patellar maltracking during multidirectional motion but increased pressure applied to medial cartilage during squatting.

          Clinical Relevance

          After establishing the influence of tibial tuberosity medialization on patellar maltracking for an idealized population, as was done in the current study, future simulation studies can be performed to better determine the anatomical characteristics of patients for whom tibial tuberosity medialization is needed to reduce the risk of postoperative patellar maltracking.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

          Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament has recently become popular for restoring patellofemoral stability. Femoral insertion site anatomy of the medial patellofemoral ligament has been described. This anatomical insertion has been inferred to be the isometric point in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, but data about radiographic landmarks for a postoperative or intraoperative control are missing. To determine the radiographic landmarks for control of postoperative and intraoperative femoral medial patellofemoral ligament insertion. Descriptive laboratory study. Eight fresh-frozen human knees were dissected, and the medial patellofemoral ligament was exposed. After identification of the femoral medial patellofemoral ligament insertion site, the insertion center was marked with a lead ball of 2-mm diameter. Straight lateral radiographs were taken, and posterior-anterior as well as proximal-distal position were evaluated. Six of 8 insertion points were anterior to a line representing an extension of the posterior cortex, 1 point was touching this line, and 1 point was posterior to it. All points were situated distal to the posterior origin of the medial femoral condyle and proximal to the most posterior point of the Blumensaat line. A reproducible anatomical and radiographic point, 1 mm anterior to the posterior cortex extension line, 2.5 mm distal to the posterior origin of the medial femoral condyle, and proximal to the level of the posterior point of the Blumensaat line on a lateral radiograph with both posterior condyles projected in the same plane, shows the mean femoral medial patellofemoral ligament center. This radiographic point may be useful both intraoperatively and postoperatively.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcomes After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for the Treatment of Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

            A patellar dislocation is a common knee injury in the young, athletic patient population. Recent trends indicate that the use of long-term nonoperative treatment is decreasing, and surgical intervention is more commonly recommended for those patients who fail initial nonoperative management with recurrent patellar dislocations. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has become increasingly utilized in this regard.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An Algorithmic Approach to the Management of Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation

              High-level evidence supports nonoperative treatment for first-time lateral acute patellar dislocations. Surgical intervention is often indicated for recurrent dislocations. Recurrent instability is often multifactorial and can be the result of a combination of coronal limb malalignment, patella alta, malrotation secondary to internal femoral or external tibial torsion, a dysplastic trochlea, or disrupted and weakened medial soft tissue, including the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and the vastus medialis obliquus. MPFL reconstruction requires precise graft placement for restoration of anatomy and minimal graft tension. MPFL reconstruction is safe to perform in skeletally immature patients and in revision surgical settings. Distal realignment procedures should be implemented in recurrent instability associated with patella alta, increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distances, and lateral and distal patellar chondrosis. Groove-deepening trochleoplasty for Dejour type-B and type-D dysplasia or a lateral elevation or proximal recession trochleoplasty for Dejour type-C dysplasia may be a component of the treatment algorithm; however, clinical outcome data are lacking. In addition, trochleoplasty is technically challenging and has a risk of substantial complications.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
                Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
                Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
                Elsevier
                2666-061X
                10 July 2023
                August 2023
                10 July 2023
                : 5
                : 4
                : 100753
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.
                [b ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
                [c ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
                Author notes
                []Address correspondence to John J. Elias, Ph.D., Department of Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave., Akron OH 44302, U.S.A. eliasj@ 123456ccf.org
                Article
                S2666-061X(23)00103-7 100753
                10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100753
                10461214
                37645404
                57619478-bbd8-4350-aa16-a205161cd758
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 December 2022
                : 29 May 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log