6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug’s high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizure (ARCS) or SE.

          Methods

          Forty patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with SE or ARCS were included in this double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio (via computer-generated code) to receive either brand-name or generic IV LEV. The primary outcomes were seizure control and the number of seizure exacerbations during the 24 h after drug administration, while the secondary outcomes were electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, serious adverse events, and clinical outcome at hospital discharge.

          Results

          Forty patients were randomly assigned administration with either brand-name IV LEV (10 SE and 10 ARCS patients) or generic IV LEV; 7 SE and 13 ARCS patients). There was no significant difference in patients’ baseline characteristics. The seizure control rate was 75% in the brand-name IV LEV group and 65% in the generic IV LEV group ( p value: 0.490). Five (25%) patients in the brand-name IV LEV group, and six (30%) patients in the generic IV LEV group developed seizure exacerbations within 24 h after drug administration ( p value 0.723). There were no reports of drug-related adverse events. Two of the patients taking brand-name IV LEV and one taking the generic IV LEV died ( p value > 0.999).

          Conclusion

          Treatment with the generic IV LEV had comparable outcomes with brand-name IV LEV. The generic IV LEV may be an alternative medication for the treatment of SE and ARCS to reduce treatment costs.

          Trial Registration

          TCTR20190513001.

          Funding

          Great Eastern Drug Company.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Status epilepticus in adults.

          Status epilepticus is a common neurological emergency with considerable associated health-care costs, morbidity, and mortality. The definition of status epilepticus as a prolonged seizure or a series of seizures with incomplete return to baseline is under reconsideration in an effort to establish a more practical definition to guide management. Clinical research has focused on early seizure termination in the prehospital setting. The approach of early escalation to anaesthetic agents for refractory generalised convulsive status epilepticus, rather than additional trials of second-line anti-epileptic drugs, to avoid neuronal injury and pharmaco-resistance associated with prolonged seizures is gaining momentum. Status epilepticus is also increasingly identified in the inpatient setting as the use of extended electroencephalography monitoring becomes more commonplace. Substantial further research to enable early identification of status epilepticus and efficacy of anti-epileptic drugs will be important to improve outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Management of generalised convulsive status epilepticus (SE): A prospective randomised controlled study of combined treatment with intravenous lorazepam with either phenytoin, sodium valproate or levetiracetam – Pilot study

            This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of phenytoin, valproate and levetiracetam in patients with GCSE.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Levetiracetam versus phenytoin in management of status epilepticus.

              The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) levetiracetam (LEV) with IV phenytoin (PHT) in management of status epilepticus (SE). The second-line treatment of SE is limited to a few drugs available in an IV formulation such as PHT, fosphenytoin and valproate. The relative lack of serious side effects and favourable pharmacokinetics of LEV made it a promising option in management of SE. Randomized trials comparing relative efficacy of second-line agents are remarkably lacking. In this study, consecutive patients of SE (n=44) were randomized to receive either IV PHT (20mg/kg) or IV LEV (20mg/kg). The primary end point was successful clinical termination of seizure activity within 30min after the beginning of the drug infusion. Secondary end points included recurrence of seizures within 24 hours, drug related adverse effects, neurological outcome at discharge, need for ventilatory assistance, and mortality during hospitalization. Both LEV and PHT were equally effective with regard to primary and secondary outcome measures. PHT achieved control of SE in 15 (68.2%) patients compared to LEV in 13 (59.1%; p=0.53). Both the groups showed comparable results with respect to recurrence of seizures within 24 hours (p=0.34), outcome at discharge as assessed by functional independence measure (p=0.68), need of ventilatory assistance (p=0.47) and death (p=1). From this study it can be concluded that LEV may be an attractive and effective alternative to PHT in management of SE.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                somtia@kku.ac.th
                Journal
                Neurol Ther
                Neurol Ther
                Neurology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8253
                2193-6536
                12 August 2019
                12 August 2019
                December 2019
                : 8
                : 2
                : 425-431
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.9786.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 0856, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, and Integrated Epilepsy Research Group, , Khon Kaen University, ; Khon Kaen, 40002 Thailand
                [2 ]GRID grid.9786.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 0856, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, and North-eastern Stroke Research Group, Research Center in Back, Neck, Other Joint Pain and Human Performance (BNOJPH), Research and Training Center for Enhancing Quality of Life of Working Age People, and Research and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases (RCEID), , Khon Kaen University, ; Khon Kaen, 40002 Thailand
                [3 ]GRID grid.9786.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 0856, Nursing Division, Faculty of Medicine, Srinagarind Hospital, , Khon Kaen University, ; Khon Kaen, 40002 Thailand
                [4 ]GRID grid.9786.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 0856, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, , Khon Kaen University, ; Khon Kaen, 40002 Thailand
                Article
                150
                10.1007/s40120-019-00150-x
                6858918
                31407191
                576efbf3-7dec-4ccd-bfb5-d64a7e5caf35
                © The Author(s) 2019
                History
                : 1 May 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Great Eastern Drug
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                acute repetitive seizures,levetiracetam,focale®,keppra®,status epilepticus

                Comments

                Comment on this article