26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link Between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences : INEQUALITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF PUBLIC OPINION

      ,
      American Journal of Political Science
      Wiley-Blackwell

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Class War?

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What Moves Policy Sentiment?.

            In spite of the fact that political eras in the United States are widely (and often ambiguously) defined in terms of a general policy sentiment or mood, political scientists have done little in the way of rigorous analysis regarding this subject. I argue that shifts in domestic policy sentiment along a liberal–conservative continuum may be understood in part as responses to changing economic expectations. Specifically, expectations of a strong economy result in greater support for liberal domestic policies, whereas anticipation of declining economic conditions pushes the national policy mood to the right. Using quarterly data for the period 1968–88, I present a multiple-time-series error correction model that lends considerable support to the hypothesis.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Income, Preferences, and the Dynamics of Policy Responsiveness

              A variety of measures indicate that income inequality has grown significantly in the United States during the last three decades (APSA 2004; Brandolini and Smeeding 2006). In a flurry of recent research, scholars have attributed this trend to the failure of the national government to represent the preferences of ordinary citizens in general and less wealthy citizens in particular (APSA 2004; Bartels 2004; 2006; Gilens 2005), who participate in politics less consistently and contribute fewer resources to political candidates than their wealthier peers (Verba, Schlozman, and Brady 1995). The American Political Science Association's (APSA) Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy summarizes thisrepresentative failure hypothesis: “disparities in participation ensure that ordinary Americans speak in a whisper while the most advantaged roar” (2004, 2).

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Political Science
                Wiley-Blackwell
                00925853
                October 2010
                October 2010
                : 54
                : 4
                : 855-870
                Article
                10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00472.x
                57af0b03-a660-4c5e-b5d9-6d878a4d81f9
                © 2010

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log