53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Cronbach's alpha is the most widely used method for estimating internal consistency reliability. This procedure has proved very resistant to the passage of time, even if its limitations are well documented and although there are better options as omega coefficient or the different versions of glb, with obvious advantages especially for applied research in which the ítems differ in quality or have skewed distributions. In this paper, using Monte Carlo simulation, the performance of these reliability coefficients under a one-dimensional model is evaluated in terms of skewness and no tau-equivalence. The results show that omega coefficient is always better choice than alpha and in the presence of skew items is preferable to use omega and glb coefficients even in small samples.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.

          Coefficient alpha is the most popular measure of reliability (and certainly of internal consistency reliability) reported in psychological research. This is noteworthy given the numerous deficiencies of coefficient alpha documented in the psychometric literature. This mismatch between theory and practice appears to arise partly because users of psychological scales are unfamiliar with the psychometric literature on coefficient alpha and partly because alternatives to alpha are not widely known. We present a brief review of the psychometric literature on coefficient alpha, followed by a practical alternative in the form of coefficient omega. To facilitate the shift from alpha to omega, we also present a brief guide to the calculation of point and interval estimates of omega using a free, open source software environment. © 2013 The British Psychological Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                26 May 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 769
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, University of La Frontera Temuco, Chile
                [2] 2Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, University Autonoma de Madrid Madrid, Spain
                [3] 3Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, University Complutense de Madrid Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Holmes Finch, Ball State University, USA

                Reviewed by: Yanyan Sheng, Southern Illinois University, USA; José Manuel Reales, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain

                *Correspondence: Italo Trizano-Hermosilla italo.trizano@ 123456ufrontera.cl

                This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
                4880791
                27303333
                57d4b9af-eb43-44ce-9b15-6007af9a2440
                Copyright © 2016 Trizano-Hermosilla and Alvarado.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 September 2015
                : 09 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 6, References: 45, Pages: 8, Words: 5291
                Categories
                Psychology
                Perspective

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                reliability,alpha,omega,greatest lower bound,asymmetrical measures

                Comments

                Comment on this article