43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unravelling psychosis: psychosocial epidemiology, mechanism, and meaning Translated title: 对精神病的社会心理流行病学、发病机制和病症意义的阐述

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          This paper reviews a revolution in our understanding of psychosis over the last 20 years. To a major extent, this has resulted from a process of cross-fertilization between psychosocial epidemiology and cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBT-p). This encouraged complementary strategies for the acquisition and analysis of data. These include the use of a range of dependent variables related to psychosis, and the exploitation of data from cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiological surveys, virtual reality experiments, experience sampling methodology, and treatment trials. The key element is to investigate social and psychological measures in relation to each other. This research has confirmed the role of the external social world in the development and persistence of psychotic disorder. In addition, several psychological drivers of psychotic experiences have been identified. There is now persuasive evidence that the influence of social factors in psychosis is significantly mediated by non-psychotic symptoms, particularly mood symptoms and other attributes of affect such as insomnia. Psychotic symptoms are also driven by reasoning biases such as jumping to conclusions and belief inflexibility, though little is known about social influences on such biases. It is now clear that there are many routes to psychosis and that it takes many forms. Treatment of all kinds should take account of this: the dependence of CBT-p on a detailed initial formulation in terms of psychological processes and social influences is an example of the required flexibility. Individual mediators are now being targeted in specific forms of CBT-p, with good effect. This in turn corroborates the hypothesized role of non-psychotic symptoms in mediation, and attests to the power of the approaches described.

          Translated abstract

          概述

          本文回顾了过去20 年我们对精神病认识的革命性变化。很大程度上说,这一变化主要得益于社会心理流行病学与针对精神病的认知行为治疗(cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis,CBT-p)的发展和交互促进。而后者也促进了数据的采集和分析方法的补充策略。这些方法包括利用与精神病相关的一系列因变量,如何分析横断面和纵向流行病学调查、虚拟现实研究、经验抽样方法研究及治疗学临床试验中采集到的数据。研究的关键是探索各个社会心理因素的相互关系和作用。这些研究证明了外部社会在精神病性障碍的发生和发展中的作用。此外,一些产生精神病性体验的心理驱动因素也被发现。现已有可靠证据表明,社会因素明显受到非精神病性症状的影响,尤其情绪症状及其他对情感有影响的症状,如失眠。精神病性症状也可以受到归因偏移的影响,如武断下结论、顽固的信念等,但是社会因素对此如何起作用仍所知甚少。现在可以明确的是精神病的成因各异,表现形式多样。对各种类型的治疗都应考虑以下这点:应根据心理过程和社会因素影响在原始的CBT-p 方案上进行相应的调整。目前某些特定形式的CBT-p 将个体调节因素作为治疗目标并取得良好的效果。这反过来证实了非精神病性症状的调节作用,并证明了所描述方法的有效性。

          中文全文

          本文全文中文版从2015年6月6日起在 http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215027可供免费阅览下载

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cognitive behavioral therapy, singly and combined with medication, for persistent insomnia: a randomized controlled trial.

          Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and hypnotic medications are efficacious for short-term treatment of insomnia, but few patients achieve complete remission with any single treatment. It is unclear whether combined or maintenance therapies would enhance outcome. To evaluate the added value of medication over CBT alone for acute treatment of insomnia and the effects of maintenance therapies on long-term outcome. Prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 2-stage therapy for 160 adults with persistent insomnia treated at a university hospital sleep center in Canada between January 2002 and April 2005. Participants received CBT alone or CBT plus 10 mg/d (taken at bedtime) of zolpidem for an initial 6-week therapy, followed by extended 6-month therapy. Patients initially treated with CBT attended monthly maintenance CBT for 6 months or received no additional treatment and those initially treated with combined therapy (CBT plus 10 mg/d of zolpidem) continued with CBT plus intermittent use of zolpidem or CBT only. Sleep onset latency, time awake after sleep onset, total sleep time, and sleep efficiency derived from daily diaries (primary outcomes); treatment response and remission rates derived from the Insomnia Severity Index (secondary outcomes). Cognitive behavioral therapy used singly or in combination with zolpidem produced significant improvements in sleep latency, time awake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency during initial therapy (all P<.001); a larger increase of sleep time was obtained with the combined approach (P = .04). Both CBT alone and CBT plus zolpidem produced similar rates of treatment responders (60% [45/75] vs 61% [45/74], respectively; P = .84) and treatment remissions (39% [29/75] vs 44% [33/74], respectively; P = .52) with the 6-week acute treatment, but combined therapy produced a higher remission rate compared with CBT alone during the 6-month extended therapy phase and the 6-month follow-up period (56% [43/74 and 32/59] vs 43% [34/75 and 28/68]; P = .05). The best long-term outcome was obtained with patients treated with combined therapy initially, followed by CBT alone, as evidenced by higher remission rates at the 6-month follow-up compared with patients who continued to take zolpidem during extended therapy (68% [20/30] vs 42% [12/29]; P = .04). In patients with persistent insomnia, the addition of medication to CBT produced added benefits during acute therapy, but long-term outcome was optimized when medication is discontinued during maintenance CBT. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00042146.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stress-reactivity in psychosis: evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis.

            This paper will review a series of studies using the Experience Sampling Method that suggest that altered sensitivity to stress is an endophenotype for psychosis. The Experience Sampling Method is a structured diary technique allowing the assessment of emotional reactivity to stressors occurring in normal daily life. Elevated emotional reactivity to stress was found in subjects vulnerable to psychosis, suggesting that affective responses to stressors in the flow of daily life are an indicator of genetic and/or environmental liability to psychosis. Indeed, the small stressors in daily life associated with affective responses also predict more intense moment-to-moment variation of subtle positive psychotic experiences. Increased emotional reactivity was found to be independent from cognitive impairments, and argued to constitute evidence of an affective pathway to psychosis that may underlie a more episodic, reactive, good-outcome type of psychosis. Evidence for this hypothesis was found in data suggesting that the experience of stressful life events and early trauma were associated with increased stress-sensitivity, and that women were more likely to display elevated stress-reactivity. These findings are discussed in the light of recent biological and psychological mechanisms.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Influence of family life on the course of schizophrenic disorders: a replication.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Shanghai Arch Psychiatry
                Shanghai Arch Psychiatry
                SAP
                Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry
                Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing (Shanghai, China )
                1002-0829
                25 April 2015
                : 27
                : 2
                : 70-81
                Affiliations
                [1]Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [* ]correspondence: p.bebbington@ 123456ucl.ac.uk (Paul BEBBINGTON);
                Article
                sap-27-01-070
                10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215027
                4466846
                26120255
                580b26eb-cf20-4361-bb5f-2da184615b85
                Copyright © 2015 by Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

                History
                : 01 February 2015
                : 23 February 2015
                Funding
                The work for this publication was unfunded.
                Categories
                Special Article

                epidemiology,social factors,psychosis,cognitive behavior therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log