34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Detection of Rotavirus from stool samples using a standardized immuno-PCR ("Imperacer") method with end-point and real-time detection.

      Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Computer Systems, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, methods, Feces, virology, Humans, Mass Screening, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Reproducibility of Results, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Rotavirus, genetics, isolation & purification, Rotavirus Infections, diagnosis, Sensitivity and Specificity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Immuno-PCR (IPCR) has been studied to increase the detection sensitivity of current enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assays (ELISA) as a novel approach for the early detection of Rotavirus infection, a major source for serious diarrhoea for susceptible risk groups. IPCR utilizes specific antibody-DNA conjugates with subsequent amplification of the marker-DNA. An antibody-DNA conjugate specific for Rotavirus antigen VP6 was synthesized and used in combination with a commercially available Rotavirus-ELISA kit. IPCR was carried out using reagents and protocols of the standardized Imperacer system. Real-time PCR monitoring of the marker-DNA amplification was compared to endpoint quantification of amplified haptene-labeled PCR products, using a microtiterplate-based PCR-ELISA. In spiked calibration samples, as few as 100 virus particles/ml could be clearly detected using the IPCR method and either real-time or end-point quantification compared to about 100,000 virus particles/ml in ELISA. Rotavirus positive and negative stool samples were correctly identified by IPCR with a clear separation even of a 10,000-fold dilution of the positive stool samples from the negative control.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article