14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      International core outcome set for clinical trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Comparisons of clinical trial findings in systematic reviews can be hindered by the heterogeneity of the outcomes reported. Moreover, the outcomes that matter most to patients might be underreported. A core outcome set can address these issues, as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials in a particular area of research. The objective in this study was to develop a core outcome set for clinical trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy.

          Methods

          Firstly, eligible outcomes were identified through a systematic review of trials of medication review in older patients (≥65 years) and interviews with 15 older patients. Secondly, an international three-round Delphi survey in four countries involving patients, healthcare professionals, and experts was conducted to validate outcomes to be included in the core outcome set. Consensus meetings were conducted to validate the results.

          Results

          Of the 164 participants invited to take part in the Delphi survey, 150 completed Round 1, including 55 patients or family caregivers, 55 healthcare professionals, and 40 experts. A total of 129 participants completed all three rounds. Sixty-four eligible outcomes were extracted from 47 articles, 32 clinical trial protocols, and patient interviews. Thirty outcomes were removed and one added after Round 1, 18 outcomes were removed after Round 2, and seven after Round 3. Results were discussed during consensus meetings. Consensus was reached on seven outcomes, which constitute the core outcome set: drug-related hospital admissions; drug overuse; drug underuse; potentially inappropriate medications; clinically significant drug-drug interactions; health-related quality of life; pain relief.

          Conclusions

          We developed a core outcome set of seven outcomes which should be used in future trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-018-1007-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Consensus measurement in Delphi studies

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews

            To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a subset of the original recorded outcome variables on the basis of the results-and its impact on Cochrane reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hospital admissions associated with adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of prospective observational studies.

              To determine the prevalence of hospital admissions associated with ADRs and examine differences in prevalence rates between population groups and methods of ADR detection. Studies were identified through electronic searches of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, and MEDLINE to August 2007. There were no language restrictions. A systematic review was conducted of prospective observational studies that used the World Health Organization ADR definition. Subgroup analysis examined the influence of patient age groups and methods of ADR detection on reported ADR admission rates. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA v 9.0. Twenty-five studies were identified including 106,586 patients who were hospitalized; 2143 of these patients had experienced ADRs. The prevalence rates of ADRs ranged from 0.16% to 15.7%, with an overall median of 5.3% (interquartile range [IQR] 2.7-9.0%). Median ADR prevalence rates varied between age groups; for children, the ADR admission rate was 4.1% (IQR 0.16-5.3%), while the corresponding rates for adults and elderly patients were 6.3% (IQR 3.9-9.0%) and 10.7% (IQR 9.6-13.3%), respectively. ADR rates also varied depending on the methods of ADR detection employed in the different studies. Studies that employed multiple ADR detection methods, such as medical record review and patient interview, reported higher ADR admission rates compared with studies that used medical record review alone. Anti-infective drugs were most often associated with ADR admissions in children; cardiovascular drugs were most often associated with ADR admissions in adults and elderly patients. Approximately 5.3% of hospital admissions were associated with ADRs. Higher rates were found in elderly patients who are likely to be receiving multiple medications for long-term illnesses. The methods used to detect ADRs are also likely to explain much of the variation in the reported ADR prevalence rates between different studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +33 3 2062 6969 , jean-baptiste.beuscart@univ-lille2.fr
                w.knol@umcutrecht.nl
                shanecullinan@rcsi.ie
                Claudio.Schneider@insel.ch
                olivia.dalleur@uclouvain.be
                benoit.boland@uclouvain.be
                stefanie.thevelin@uclouvain.be
                P.A.F.Jansen@umcutrecht.nl
                denis.omahony@ucc.ie
                Nicolas.Rodondi@insel.ch
                anne.spinewine@uclouvain.be
                Journal
                BMC Med
                BMC Med
                BMC Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1741-7015
                13 February 2018
                13 February 2018
                2018
                : 16
                : 21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2294 713X, GRID grid.7942.8, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Clinical pharmacy research group, , Université catholique de Louvain, ; Brussels, Belgium
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2186 1211, GRID grid.4461.7, Université Lille, EA 2694 - Santé publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins, ; F-59000 Lille, France
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000090126352, GRID grid.7692.a, Department of Geriatric Medicine and Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons, , University Medical Centre Utrecht, ; Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000123318773, GRID grid.7872.a, Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Cavanagh Pharmacy Building, , University College Cork, ; College Road, Cork, Ireland
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0488 7120, GRID grid.4912.e, School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0479 0855, GRID grid.411656.1, Department of General Internal Medicine, , Bern University Hospital, ; Bern, Switzerland
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0461 6320, GRID grid.48769.34, Pharmacy department, , Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, ; Brussels, Belgium
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2294 713X, GRID grid.7942.8, Geriatric Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Santé et Société, , Université catholique de Louvain, ; Brussels, Belgium
                [9 ]ISNI 0000000123318773, GRID grid.7872.a, Department of Geriatric Medicine, , Cork University Hospital and Department of Medicine, University College Cork, ; Cork, Ireland
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0726 5157, GRID grid.5734.5, Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, ; Bern, Switzerland
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2294 713X, GRID grid.7942.8, Pharmacy department, , CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, ; Yvoir, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-8371
                Article
                1007
                10.1186/s12916-018-1007-9
                5809844
                29433501
                5824bb33-1cf2-4fe5-825a-52f79ad31024
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 23 September 2017
                : 17 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007601, Horizon 2020;
                Award ID: 6342388
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Medicine
                core outcome set,medication review,older patients,multi-morbidity,polypharmacy,delphi survey,consensus

                Comments

                Comment on this article