22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity

      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 5 , 1 , 3 , 6 , 1 , 1 , 7 , 1 , 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 1 , 14 , 15 , 1 , 16 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 17 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 17 , 3 , 18 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 6 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 1 , 22 , 18 , 23 , 1 , 3 , 24 , 25 , 1 , 7 , 26 , 23 , 10 , 1 , 27 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 10 , 28 , 1 , 29 , 1 , 1 , 30 , 31 , 1
      Science
      American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          More than just numbers

          We often frame negative human impacts on animal species in terms of numbers of individuals reduced or numbers of regions from which species are absent. However, human activities are likely affecting species in more complex ways than these figures can capture. Kühl et al.studied behavioral and cultural diversity in our closest relative, the chimpanzee. They found that human-mediated disturbance is reducing these complex traits. Human influence thus goes well beyond simple loss of populations or species, leading to behavioral change even where populations persist.

          Science, this issue p. [Related article:]1453

          Abstract

          Living close to humans alters chimpanzee behavior and culture.

          Abstract

          Chimpanzees possess a large number of behavioral and cultural traits among nonhuman species. The “disturbance hypothesis” predicts that human impact depletes resources and disrupts social learning processes necessary for behavioral and cultural transmission. We used a dataset of 144 chimpanzee communities, with information on 31 behaviors, to show that chimpanzees inhabiting areas with high human impact have a mean probability of occurrence reduced by 88%, across all behaviors, compared to low-impact areas. This behavioral diversity loss was evident irrespective of the grouping or categorization of behaviors. Therefore, human impact may not only be associated with the loss of populations and genetic diversity, but also affects how animals behave. Our results support the view that “culturally significant units” should be integrated into wildlife conservation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

              Linear mixed-effects models (LMEMs) have become increasingly prominent in psycholinguistics and related areas. However, many researchers do not seem to appreciate how random effects structures affect the generalizability of an analysis. Here, we argue that researchers using LMEMs for confirmatory hypothesis testing should minimally adhere to the standards that have been in place for many decades. Through theoretical arguments and Monte Carlo simulation, we show that LMEMs generalize best when they include the maximal random effects structure justified by the design. The generalization performance of LMEMs including data-driven random effects structures strongly depends upon modeling criteria and sample size, yielding reasonable results on moderately-sized samples when conservative criteria are used, but with little or no power advantage over maximal models. Finally, random-intercepts-only LMEMs used on within-subjects and/or within-items data from populations where subjects and/or items vary in their sensitivity to experimental manipulations always generalize worse than separate F 1 and F 2 tests, and in many cases, even worse than F 1 alone. Maximal LMEMs should be the 'gold standard' for confirmatory hypothesis testing in psycholinguistics and beyond.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                March 29 2019
                March 29 2019
                : 363
                : 6434
                : 1453-1455
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
                [2 ]German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, Halle-Leipzig-Jena, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
                [3 ]Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
                [4 ]West Chester University, Departments of Anthropology and Sociology and Psychology, West Chester, PA 19382, USA.
                [5 ]Department of Wildlife and Range Management, Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
                [6 ]Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, USA.
                [7 ]Chimbo Foundation, Amstel 49, 1011 PW Amsterdam, Netherlands.
                [8 ]The Aspinall Foundation, Port Lympne Wild Animal Park, Hythe, Kent, UK.
                [9 ]Elephant Listening Project, Bioacoustics Research Program Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
                [10 ]Centre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium.
                [11 ]School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
                [12 ]Agence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux, Batterie 4, BP20379, Libreville, Gabon.
                [13 ]Institute de Recherche en Ecologie Tropicale, Libreville, Gabon.
                [14 ]Royal Holloway, University of London Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
                [15 ]Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Potton Road, Sandy SG19 2DL, UK.
                [16 ]University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QG, UK.
                [17 ]School of Human Evolution and Social Change and Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, 900 Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
                [18 ]Instituto Jane Goodall España, Station Biologique Fouta Djallon, Dindéfélo, Région de Kédougou, Senegal.
                [19 ]Ebo Forest Research Project, BP3055, Messa, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
                [20 ]Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, Escondido, CA 92025, USA.
                [21 ]Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
                [22 ]Korup Rainforest Conservation Society, Korup National Park, P.O. Box 36 Mundemba, SW Region, Cameroon.
                [23 ]School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
                [24 ]West Chester University, Department of Psychology, West Chester, PA 19382, USA.
                [25 ]Washington University in Saint Louis, Department of Anthropology, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
                [26 ]University College London, Department of Anthropology, London WC1H 0BW, UK.
                [27 ]Frankfurt Zoological Society, Bernhard-Grzimek-Allee 1, 60316 Frankfurt, Germany.
                [28 ]Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
                [29 ]Taï Chimpanzee Project, Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques, BP 1301, Abidjan 01, Côte d’Ivoire.
                [30 ]Université de Neuchâtel, Institut de Biologie, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
                [31 ]School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.
                Article
                10.1126/science.aau4532
                30846610
                5837c61d-ebb0-4539-ba79-4020a5e09d6f
                © 2019
                History
                Product
                Self URI (article page): https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aau4532

                Comments

                Comment on this article