4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors for delirium among older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review protocol

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Delirium is commonly missed in older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). Although current recommendations for active screening of delirium in the ED, this might not be feasible or practical. Identifying patients at high risk for prevalent and incident delirium in the ED will help to improve the screening process and to build interventions. There is currently scattered synthesis of evidence on risk factors associated with delirium in the ED. To address this gap, we are conducting a systematic review to describe the risk factors (patient vulnerability factors and precipitating factors) for delirium in the ED.

          Methods and analysis

          A literature search was performed from inception to March 2020 in Ovid EBM Reviews, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. We will include original research studies that report a quantitative relationship between at least one risk factor and delirium in the ED setting. Two investigators will use eligibility criteria from this protocol to independently screen titles and abstracts, and select studies based on full-text review of potentially eligible studies. After arriving at a final set of included studies, two investigators will extract data using a standardised data collection form. If appropriate, data regarding each risk factor will be pooled through a random-effect meta-analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to evaluate the overall quality of evidence.

          Ethics and dissemination

          To our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review evaluating risk factors for prevalent and incident delirium specifically related to the ED setting. Results of this study will aid in the identification of older adults at risk for delirium in the ED. We aim to publish the results of this systematic review in a peer-reviewed journal with good visibility for the fields of emergency medicine and geriatrics.

          PROSPERO registration number

          CDR42020175261

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          3D-CAM: derivation and validation of a 3-minute diagnostic interview for CAM-defined delirium: a cross-sectional diagnostic test study.

          Delirium is common, leads to other adverse outcomes, and is costly. However, it often remains unrecognized in most clinical settings. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is the most widely used diagnostic algorithm, and operationalizing its features would be a substantial advance for clinical care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Geriatric Conditions in Acutely Hospitalized Older Patients: Prevalence and One-Year Survival and Functional Decline

            Background To study the prevalence of eighteen geriatric conditions in older patients at admission, their reporting rate in discharge summaries and the impact of these conditions on mortality and functional decline one year after admission. Method A prospective multicenter cohort study conducted between 2006 and 2008 in two tertiary university teaching hospitals and one regional teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Patients of 65 years and older, acutely admitted and hospitalized for at least 48 hours, were invited to participate. Eighteen geriatric conditions were assessed at hospital admission, and outcomes (mortality, functional decline) were assessed one year after admission. Results 639 patients were included, with a mean age of 78 years. IADL impairment (83%), polypharmacy (61%), mobility difficulty (59%), high levels of primary caregiver burden (53%), and malnutrition (52%) were most prevalent. Except for polypharmacy and cognitive impairment, the reporting rate of the geriatric conditions in discharge summaries was less than 50%. One year after admission, 35% had died and 33% suffered from functional decline. A high Charlson comorbidity index score, presence of malnutrition, high fall risk, presence of delirium and premorbid IADL impairment were associated with mortality and overall poor outcome (mortality or functional decline). Obesity lowered the risk for mortality. Conclusion Geriatric conditions were highly prevalent and associated with poor health outcomes after admission. Early recognition of these conditions in acutely hospitalized older patients and improving the handover to the general practitioner could lead to better health outcomes and reduce the burden of hospital admission for older patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks

              The objective of this study was to provide guidance on the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to determine certainty in estimates of association between prognostic factors and future outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                20 July 2020
                : 10
                : 7
                : e039175
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [2 ]departmentMedical School , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
                [3 ]departmentMayo Clinic Libraries , Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine , Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee, USA
                [5 ]departmentGeriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center , VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus , Nashville, Tennessee, USA
                [6 ]departmentDepartment of Health Sciences Research , Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Lucas Oliveira J e Silva; lojesilva@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5388-9163
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-3915
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-039175
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039175
                7375496
                32690751
                58382495-a445-4d6f-a1f5-e598eb167585
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 07 April 2020
                : 29 May 2020
                : 10 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Kern Society Innovation Award, from the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery.;
                Categories
                Emergency Medicine
                1506
                1691
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                delirium & cognitive disorders,geriatric medicine,protocols & guidelines,accident & emergency medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article