Blocked versus randomized presentation modes differentially modulate feedback-related negativity and P3b amplitudes

Highlights

• •

  ERP responses to feedback stimuli with explicit or assigned valence information were investigated with blocked or randomized trial presentation modes.

• •

  Only P3b, but not feedback-related negativity amplitudes were affected by feedback type for both presentation modes.

• •

  Results suggest using blocked design when using different types of feedback stimuli.

Abstract

Objective

Electrophysiological studies on feedback processing typically use a wide range of feedback stimuli which might not always be comparable. The current study investigated whether two indicators of feedback processing – feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3b – differ for feedback stimuli with explicit (facial expressions) or assigned valence information (symbols). In addition, we assessed whether presenting feedback in either a trial-by-trial or a block-wise fashion affected these ERPs.

Methods

EEG was recorded in three experiments while participants performed a time estimation task and received two different types of performance feedback.

Results

Only P3b amplitudes varied consistently in response to feedback type for both presentation types. Moreover, the blocked feedback type presentation yielded more distinct FRN peaks, higher effect sizes, and a significant relation between FRN amplitudes and behavioral task performance measures.

Conclusion

Both stimulus type and presentation mode may provoke systematic changes in feedback-related ERPs. The current findings point at important potential confounds that need to be controlled for when designing FRN or P3b studies.

Significance

Studies investigating P3b amplitudes using mixed types of stimuli have to be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, we suggest implementing a blocked presentation format when presenting different feedback types within the same experiment.