Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

Causal Illusions in the Service of Political Attitudes in Spain and the United Kingdom

Read this article at

Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      The causal illusion is a cognitive bias that results in the perception of causality where there is no supporting evidence. We show that people selectively exhibit the bias, especially in those situations where it favors their current worldview as revealed by their political orientation. In our two experiments (one conducted in Spain and one conducted in the United Kingdom), participants who self-positioned themselves on the ideological left formed the illusion that a left-wing ruling party was more successful in improving city indicators than a right-wing party, while participants on the ideological right tended to show the opposite pattern. In sum, despite the fact that the same information was presented to all participants, people developed the causal illusion bias selectively, providing very different interpretations that aligned with their previous attitudes. This result occurs in situations where participants inspect the relationship between the government’s actions and positive outcomes (improving city indicators) but not when the outcomes are negative (worsening city indicators).

      Related collections

      Most cited references 47

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

      G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: found
        • Article: not found

        The case for motivated reasoning.

         Z Kunda (1990)
        It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs. The motivation to be accurate enhances use of those beliefs and strategies that are considered most appropriate, whereas the motivation to arrive at particular conclusions enhances use of those that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion. There is considerable evidence that people are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at, but their ability to do so is constrained by their ability to construct seemingly reasonable justifications for these conclusions. These ideas can account for a wide variety of research concerned with motivated reasoning.
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            1Departamento de Fundamentos y Métodos de la Psicología, University of Deusto , Bilbao, Spain
            2Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, University of Deusto , Bilbao, Spain
            Author notes

            Edited by: Jeremy A. Frimer, University of Winnipeg, Canada

            Reviewed by: Guillermo B. Willis, Universidad de Granada, Spain; Gayannee Kedia, University of Graz, Austria

            *Correspondence: Fernando Blanco, fernandoblanco@ 123456deusto.es

            This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

            Contributors
            Journal
            Front Psychol
            Front Psychol
            Front. Psychol.
            Frontiers in Psychology
            Frontiers Media S.A.
            1664-1078
            28 June 2018
            2018
            : 9
            6032155
            10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01033
            Copyright © 2018 Blanco, Gómez-Fortes and Matute.

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

            Counts
            Figures: 8, Tables: 10, Equations: 1, References: 49, Pages: 14, Words: 0
            Categories
            Psychology
            Original Research

            Comments

            Comment on this article