9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries

      review-article
      , PhD 1 , , MSc 1 , , PhD 2 , 3 , , PhD 4 , , PhD 5 , , MD 6 , , PhD 7 , , PhD 8 , , PhD 9 , , PhD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , PhD 13 , , PhD 14 , 15 , , PhD 16 , , MSc 17 , , PhD 18 , , PhD 19 , , PhD 20 , , PhD 21 , , PhD 22 , , MD 23 , , PhD 24 , , MD 25 , , MD 17 , , MD 26 , , PhD 27 , , MD 28 , , MD 29 , , PhD 10 , , MD 30 , , PhD 31 , , PhD 31 , , PhD 32 , , PhD 33 , , PhD 34 , , PhD 35 , , MD 36 , , PhD 37 , , MD 28 , , PhD 38 , , PhD 39 , , PhD 40 , , MD 41 , , MSc 42
      Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
      Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health
      epidemiology, exhaustion, job stress, occupational health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          A consensual definition of occupational burnout is currently lacking. We aimed to harmonize the definition of occupational burnout as a health outcome in medical research and reach a consensus on this definition within the Network on the Coordination and Harmonisation of European Occupational Cohorts (OMEGA-NET).

          Methods:

          First, we performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase (January 1990 to August 2018) and a semantic analysis of the available definitions. We used the definitions of burnout and burnout-related concepts from the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) to formulate a consistent harmonized definition of the concept. Second, we sought to obtain the Delphi consensus on the proposed definition.

          Results:

          We identified 88 unique definitions of burnout and assigned each of them to 1 of the 11 original definitions. The semantic analysis yielded a first proposal, further reformulated according to SNOMED-CT and the panelists’ comments as follows: “ In a worker, occupational burnout or occupational physical AND emotional exhaustion state is an exhaustion due to prolonged exposure to work-related problems”. A panel of 50 experts (researchers and healthcare professionals with an interest for occupational burnout) reached consensus on this proposal at the second round of the Delphi, with 82% of experts agreeing on it.

          Conclusion:

          This study resulted in a harmonized definition of occupational burnout approved by experts from 29 countries within OMEGA-NET. Future research should address the reproducibility of the Delphi consensus in a larger panel of experts, representing more countries, and examine the practicability of the definition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.

          To investigate how consensus is operationalized in Delphi studies and to explore the role of consensus in determining the results of these studies. Systematic review of a random sample of 100 English language Delphi studies, from two large multidisciplinary databases [ISI Web of Science (Thompson Reuters, New York, NY) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL)], published between 2000 and 2009. About 98 of the Delphi studies purported to assess consensus, although a definition for consensus was only provided in 72 of the studies (64 a priori). The most common definition for consensus was percent agreement (25 studies), with 75% being the median threshold to define consensus. Although the authors concluded in 86 of the studies that consensus was achieved, consensus was only specified a priori (with a threshold value) in 42 of these studies. Achievement of consensus was related to the decision to stop the Delphi study in only 23 studies, with 70 studies terminating after a specified number of rounds. Although consensus generally is felt to be of primary importance to the Delphi process, definitions of consensus vary widely and are poorly reported. Improved criteria for reporting of methods of Delphi studies are required. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians

              Burnout is a self-reported job-related syndrome increasingly recognized as a critical factor affecting physicians and their patients. An accurate estimate of burnout prevalence among physicians would have important health policy implications, but the overall prevalence is unknown.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Scand J Work Environ Health
                Scand J Work Environ Health
                Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
                Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (Finland )
                0355-3140
                1795-990X
                1 March 2021
                1 December 2020
                1 March 2021
                : 47
                : 2
                : 95-107
                Affiliations
                [1]Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2]Faculty of Arts, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
                [3]Center for Hellenic Studies, Harvard University, USA
                [4]Division of Occupational Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Hungary
                [5]Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Italy
                [6]Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Prilly, Switzerland
                [7]Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
                [8]Institute of Occupational Health of RNM, WHO CC, Skopje, RN Macedonia
                [9]Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia
                [10]National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway
                [11]National Romanian Television, Occupational Health Department, Bucharest, Romania
                [12]Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
                [13]Management and Psychology department, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
                [14]Environmental Health Department, National Institute of Health, Porto, Portugal
                [15]Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
                [16]Clinical Institute of Occupational, Traffic, and Sports Medicine, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [17]Occupational Health Unit, Service of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
                [18]Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Rīga Stradiņs University, Riga, Latvia
                [19]Department of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Leuven, Belgium
                [20]Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Germany
                [21]Work Careers and Workability Department, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
                [22]Alexandru Darabont National Research and Development Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Bucharest, Romania
                [23]Division of Non-Communicable Diseases and Trauma, Public Health France, Saint-Maurice, France
                [24]Institute of Public Health, Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Hacettepe University, Turkey
                [25]Unit of Occupational Medicine, University of Trieste, Italy
                [26]Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Medical Faculty University, Paris, France
                [27]College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
                [28]Multisectoral Occupational Health Service, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                [29]Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
                [30]Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [31]Institute of Occupational Health of RNM, WHO CC, Skopje, RN Macedonia
                [32]Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Italy
                [33]Department of Occupational Medicine, Medical Faculty University of Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
                [34]Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, The Netherlands
                [35]Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
                [36]National Institute of Public Health of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [37]Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
                [38]Department of Occupational Medicine, Medical Faculty University of Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
                [39]Occupational and Health Psychologist. Shared Ambition, People management, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
                [40]Institute of Occupational Safety and Environmental Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Latvia
                [41]Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [42]Swiss Association of Work & Organization Psychologists, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Prof. I. Guseva Canu, Unisanté, Department of occupational and environmental health, Route de la Corniche, 2, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland. [E-mail: irina.guseva-canu@ 123456unisante.ch ]
                Article
                3935
                10.5271/sjweh.3935
                8114565
                33258478
                58804df1-5833-4364-8a83-90e8d7b5cd12
                Copyright: © Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 8 June 2020
                Categories
                Review

                epidemiology,exhaustion,job stress,occupational health
                epidemiology, exhaustion, job stress, occupational health

                Comments

                Comment on this article