13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is rapidly increasing in Western countries. This tumour frequently presents late in its course with metastatic disease and has a very poor prognosis. Barrett’s oesophagus is an acquired condition whereby the native squamous mucosa of the lower oesophagus is replaced by columnar epithelium following prolonged gastro-oesophageal reflux and is the recognised precursor lesion for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. There are multiple national and society guidelines regarding screening, surveillance and management of Barrett’s oesophagus, however all are limited regarding a clear evidence base for a well-demonstrated benefit and cost-effectiveness of surveillance, and robust risk stratification for patients to best use resources. Currently the accepted risk factors upon which surveillance intervals and interventions are based are Barrett’s segment length and histological interpretation of the systematic biopsies. Further patient risk factors including other demographic features, smoking, gender, obesity, ethnicity, patient age, biomarkers and endoscopic adjuncts remain under consideration and are discussed in full. Recent evidence has been published to support earlier endoscopic intervention by means of ablation of the metaplastic Barrett’s segment when the earliest signs of dysplasia are detected. Further work should concentrate on establishing better risk stratification and primary and secondary preventative strategies to reduce the risk of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references117

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Observer variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

          The potential value of biopsy surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus for dysplasia is diminished by a lack of agreement on the diagnostic criteria for dysplasia. In a preliminary consensus conference, experienced gastrointestinal pathologists from four medical centers agreed on criteria for a five-tiered histologic classification of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus--negative for dysplasia, indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and intramucosal carcinoma. Eight morphologists in the four centers tested the criteria for interobserver agreement by examining a set of coded slides that had been chosen to include some especially difficult interpretative problems in all five histologic classifications. Interobserver agreement of 85 and 87% was achieved in successive reviews when the combined group of high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma was compared with the combined group of low-grade dysplasia, indefinite for dysplasia, and negative for dysplasia. Comparison of other groups yielded less agreement. For example, negative for dysplasia could be distinguished from all other diagnoses with an interobserver agreement of 72%. We conclude that experienced gastrointestinal morphologists can diagnose high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma with a high degree of agreement and thus can detect those patients who may need immediate rebiopsy or esophageal resection. Either further refinement of histologic criteria or alternate diagnostic methods will be needed to achieve the reproducible diagnosis of indefinite changes and low-grade dysplasia. This is important because patients with such changes theoretically merit closer endoscopic surveillance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Metabolomics analysis for biomarker discovery: advances and challenges.

            Over the last decades there has been a change in biomedical research with the search for single genes, transcripts, proteins, or metabolites being substituted by the coverage of the entire genome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome with the "omics" approaches. The emergence of metabolomics, defined as the comprehensive analysis of all metabolites in a system, is still recent compared to other "omics" fields, but its particular features and the improvement of both analytical techniques and pattern recognition methods has contributed greatly to its increasingly use. The feasibility of metabolomics for biomarker discovery is supported by the assumption that metabolites are important players in biological systems and that diseases cause disruption of biochemical pathways, which are not new concepts. In fact, metabolomics, meaning the parallel assessment of multiple metabolites, has been shown to have benefits in various clinical areas. Compared to classical diagnostic approaches and conventional clinical biomarkers, metabolomics offers potential advantages in sensitivity and specificity. Despite its potential, metabolomics still retains several intrinsic limitations which have a great impact on its widespread implementation - these limitations in biological and experimental measurements. This review will provide an insight to the characteristics, strengths, limitations, and recent advances in metabolomics, always keeping in mind its potential application in clinical/ health areas as a biomarker discovery tool.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mucosal iodine staining improves endoscopic visualization of squamous dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in Linxian, China.

              In previous studies in the high risk population of Linxian, China, the majority of foci of high grade (moderate and severe) squamous dysplasia (HGD) and invasive squamous carcinoma (CA) of the esophagus were associated with endoscopically visible lesions that could be targeted for biopsy, but some foci of HGD were missed by routine endoscopic examination. This study examined whether spraying the mucosa with Lugol's iodine solution, which stains normal epithelium brown but leaves dysplasia and carcinoma unstained, could improve endoscopic detection and delineation of these lesions. Two hundred twenty-five Linxian adults with balloon cytologic evidence of dysplasia or carcinoma underwent endoscopy. All visible lesions were described and photographed before and after staining with 1.2% Lugol's iodine solution. Biopsies were taken from all lesions visible before staining, from all unstained lesions (USLs) after applying the stain, and from representative control areas of stained mucosa. Two hundred fifty-three USLs and 255 control sites were biopsied. No complications occurred. Ninety-four biopsy sites contained HGD and 20 contained CA. Before staining, the sensitivity of visible lesions for identifying HGD or CA was 62%, and the specificity was 79%. After staining, the sensitivity of USLs for identifying HGD or CA was 96%, and the specificity was 63%. Eighty-eight percent of the HGD and CA lesions were larger or more clearly defined after staining. The diagnostic lesions in 17 of 31 patients with moderate dysplasia (55%), 8 of 35 patients with severe dysplasia (23%), and none of the 19 patients with invasive carcinoma (0%) were identified only after staining. Mucosal iodine staining improved endoscopic detection and delineation of HGD and CA in these patients. This simple technique is highly sensitive for identifying these precursor and invasive squamous lesions, and it should be used whenever optimal visualization of squamous mucosal abnormalities is required.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                World J Gastroenterol
                World J. Gastroenterol
                WJG
                World Journal of Gastroenterology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1007-9327
                2219-2840
                28 July 2017
                28 July 2017
                : 23
                : 28
                : 5051-5067
                Affiliations
                Chidi Amadi, Piers Gatenby, Regional Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Amadi C constructed and wrote this paper; Gatenby P conceptualised the idea and reviewed the paper.

                Correspondence to: Chidi Amadi, MBBS, BSc, Medical Doctor, Regional Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom. chidi.amadi@ 123456nhs.net

                Telephone: +44-1483-571122-2703 Fax: +44-1483-406636

                Article
                jWJG.v23.i28.pg5051
                10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051
                5537175
                28811703
                588ad58d-a568-4332-8444-f9600d809a6b
                ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 3 February 2017
                : 3 April 2017
                : 4 July 2017
                Categories
                Review

                barrett’s oesophagus,gastroenterology,endoscopy,oesophageal adenocarcinoma,dysplasia

                Comments

                Comment on this article