8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nursing home profit status and quality of care: is there any evidence of an association?

      Medical care research and review : MCRR
      Canada, Income, Nursing Homes, economics, standards, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Ownership, Quality Indicators, Health Care, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article critically reviews the association between the profit status of North American nursing homes and the quality of care. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE (January 1990-October 2002), reference lists, letters, commentaries, and editorials. The quality indicator(s) used to measure quality of care, and its relationship to profit status, was extracted from each publication. The study design and risk-adjustment methodologies used were also extracted. The interrater reliability for the extraction of these three items was determined to be 1.0, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively. A qualitative systematic review was performed using Donabedian's framework of structure, process, and outcome for analyzing medical quality of care. Empirical research in the past 12 years has found that systematic differences exist between for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes. For-profit nursing homes appear to provide lower quality of care in many important areas of process and outcome.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          15750174
          10.1177/1077558704273769

          Chemistry
          Canada,Income,Nursing Homes,economics,standards,Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care),Ownership,Quality Indicators, Health Care,United States

          Comments

          Comment on this article