26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception

      brief-report
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 ,
      Current Biology
      Cell Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Perception routinely integrates inputs from different senses. Stimulus temporal proximity critically determines whether or not these inputs are bound together. Despite the temporal window of integration being a widely accepted notion, its neurophysiological substrate remains unclear. Many types of common audio-visual interactions occur within a time window of ∼100 ms [ 1–5]. For example, in the sound-induced double-flash illusion, when two beeps are presented within ∼100 ms together with one flash, a second illusory flash is often perceived [ 2]. Due to their intrinsic rhythmic nature, brain oscillations are one candidate mechanism for gating the temporal window of integration. Interestingly, occipital alpha band oscillations cycle on average every ∼100 ms, with peak frequencies ranging between 8 and 14 Hz (i.e., 120–60 ms cycle). Moreover, presenting a brief tone can phase-reset such oscillations in visual cortex [ 6, 7]. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the duration of each alpha cycle might provide the temporal unit to bind audio-visual events. Here, we first recorded EEG while participants performed the sound-induced double-flash illusion task [ 4] and found positive correlation between individual alpha frequency (IAF) peak and the size of the temporal window of the illusion. Participants then performed the same task while receiving occipital transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), to modulate oscillatory activity [ 8] either at their IAF or at off-peak alpha frequencies (IAF±2 Hz). Compared to IAF tACS, IAF−2 Hz and IAF+2 Hz tACS, respectively, enlarged and shrunk the temporal window of illusion, suggesting that alpha oscillations might represent the temporal unit of visual processing that cyclically gates perception and the neurophysiological substrate promoting audio-visual interactions.

          Highlights

          • Peak α frequency predicts temporal windows of the double-flash illusion

          • tACS tuned around α frequency causally modulates this illusory temporal window

          • Slower versus faster tACS α frequencies enlarged versus shrunk the illusory temporal window

          • α peak is the “fingerprint” driving crossmodal impact upon visual processing

          Abstract

          Multisensory integration occurs within a critical temporal window. Cecere et al. discover the neurophysiological correlates of this phenomenon. Individual oscillatory frequency within the occipital α band causally determines the individual temporal profile of cross-sensory integration, setting the sensory pace of conscious perceptual experience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation.

          Novel methods for neuronal entrainment [1-4] provide the unique opportunity to modulate perceptually relevant brain oscillations [5, 6] in a frequency-specific manner and to study their functional impact on distinct cognitive functions. Recently, evidence has emerged that tACS (transcranial alternating current stimulation) can modulate cortical oscillations [7-9]. However, the study of electrophysiological effects has been hampered so far by the absence of concurrent electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Here, we applied 10 Hz tACS to the parieto-occipital cortex and utilized simultaneous EEG recordings to study neuronal entrainment during stimulation. We pioneer a novel approach for simultaneous tACS-EEG recordings and successfully separate stimulation artifacts from ongoing and event-related cortical activity. Our results reveal that 10 Hz tACS increases parieto-occipital alpha activity and synchronizes cortical oscillators with similar intrinsic frequencies to the entrainment frequency. Additionally, we demonstrate that tACS modulates target detection performance in a phase-dependent fashion highlighting the causal role of alpha oscillations for visual perception. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Illusions. What you see is what you hear.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reward timing in the primary visual cortex.

              We discovered that when adult rats experience an association between visual stimuli and subsequent rewards, the responses of a substantial fraction of neurons in the primary visual cortex evolve from those that relate solely to the physical attributes of the stimuli to those that accurately predict the timing of reward. In addition to revealing a remarkable type of response plasticity in adult V1, these data demonstrate that reward-timing activity-a "higher" brain function-can occur very early in sensory-processing paths. These findings challenge the traditional interpretation of activity in the primary visual cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Curr. Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                19 January 2015
                19 January 2015
                : 25
                : 2
                : 231-235
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Brain Science, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
                [2 ]Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK
                [3 ]UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK
                [4 ]Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author vromei@ 123456essex.ac.uk
                Article
                S0960-9822(14)01495-X
                10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.034
                4300399
                25544613
                59004770-633f-4709-8ff1-02b0dd3bcb31
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 24 July 2014
                : 21 October 2014
                : 13 November 2014
                Categories
                Report

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article