17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Non-Commutative Integrability of the Grassmann Pentagram Map

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The pentagram map is a discrete integrable system first introduced by Schwartz in 1992. It was proved to be intregable by Schwartz, Ovsienko, and Tabachnikov in 2010. Gekhtman, Shapiro, and Vainshtein studied Poisson geometry associated to certain networks embedded in a disc or annulus, and its relation to cluster algebras. Later, Gekhtman et al. and Tabachnikov reinterpreted the pentagram map in terms of these networks, and used the associated Poisson structures to give a new proof of integrability. In 2011, Mari Beffa and Felipe introduced a generalization of the pentagram map to certain Grassmannians, and proved it was integrable. We reinterpret this Grassmann pentagram map in terms of noncommutative algebra, in particular the double brackets of Van den bergh, and generalize the approach of Gekhtman et al. to establish a noncommutative version of integrability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Quasi-Poisson Structures on Representation Spaces of Surfaces

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            27 October 2018
            Article
            1810.11742
            590fddc4-fcb1-49df-99b4-d5dcc4c1f31b

            http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            History
            Custom metadata
            math.QA math.CO math.SG

            Combinatorics,Geometry & Topology,Algebra
            Combinatorics, Geometry & Topology, Algebra

            Comments

            Comment on this article