21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Open organisational culture: what does it entail? Healthcare stakeholders reaching consensus by means of a Delphi technique

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Open organisational culture in hospitals is important, yet it remains unclear what it entails other than its referral to ‘open communication’ in the context of patient safety. This study aims to identify the elements of an open hospital culture.

          Methods

          In this group consensus study with a Delphi technique, statements were constructed based on the existing patient safety literature and input of 11 healthcare professionals from different backgrounds. A final framework consisting of 36 statements was reviewed on inclusion and exclusion, in multiple rounds by 32 experts and professionals working in healthcare. The feedback was analysed and shared with the panel after the group reached consensus on statements (>70% agreement).

          Results

          The procedure resulted in 37 statements representing tangible (ie, leadership, organisational structures and processes, communication systems, employee attitudes, training and development, and patient orientation) and intangible themes (ie, psychological safety, open communication, cohesion, power, blame and shame, morals and ethics, and support and trust). The culture themes’ teamwork and commitment were not specific for an open culture, contradicting the patient safety literature. Thereby, an open mind was shown to be a novel characteristic.

          Conclusions

          Open culture entails an open mind-set and attitude of professionals beyond the scope of patient safety in which there is mutual awareness of each other’s (un)conscious biases, focus on team relationships and professional well-being and a transparent system with supervisors/leaders being role models and patients being involved. Although it is generally acknowledged that microlevel social processes necessary to enact patient safety deserve more attention, research has largely emphasised system-level structures and processes. This study provides practical enablers for addressing system and microlevel social processes to work towards an open culture in and across teams.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System

          (2000)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

            Consensus methods such as the Delphi survey technique are being employed to help enhance effective decision-making in health and social care. The Delphi survey is a group facilitation technique, which is an iterative multistage process, designed to transform opinion into group consensus. It is a flexible approach, that is used commonly within the health and social sciences, yet little guidance exists to help researchers undertake this method of data collection. This paper aims to provide an understanding of the preparation, action steps and difficulties that are inherent within the Delphi. Used systematically and rigorously, the Delphi can contribute significantly to broadening knowledge within the nursing profession. However, careful thought must be given before using the method; there are key issues surrounding problem identification, researcher skills and data presentation that must be addressed. The paper does not claim to be definitive; it purports to act as a guide for those researchers who wish to exploit the Delphi methodology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Delphi technique in health sciences education research.

              The Delphi technique is a method of collecting opinion on a particular research question. It is based on the premise that pooled intelligence enhances individual judgement and captures the collective opinion of a group of experts without being physically assembled. The conventional Delphi uses a series of questionnaires to generate expert opinion in an anonymous fashion and takes place over a series of rounds. The technique is becoming a popular strategy that straddles both quantitative and qualitative realms. Issues that are critical to its validity are the development of the questionnaire; definition of consensus and how to interpret non-consensus; criteria for and selection of the expert panel; sample size; and data analysis. The authors used the Delphi technique to assist with making recommendations regarding education and training for medical practitioners working in district hospitals in South Africa. The objective of this Delphi was to obtain consensus opinion on content and methods relating to the maintenance of competence of these doctors. They believe the experience gained from their work may be useful for other health science education researchers wishing to use the Delphi method.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                14 September 2021
                : 11
                : 9
                : e045515
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentResearch and Education , OLVG , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]departmentHealth Policy and Management , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]departmentOrthopaedic Surgery , OLVG , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]departmentObstetrics and Gynaecology , Amsterdam University Medical Center , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Romana Fattimah Malik; romana_malik@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-9791
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-8636
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-045515
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045515
                8442051
                34521658
                5951af6d-d7ce-4dac-8d33-d8a441d288e3
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 06 October 2020
                : 29 July 2021
                Categories
                Health Policy
                1506
                1703
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                change management,health policy,organisational development,medical education & training,health & safety,human resource management

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content4

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors677