Blog
About

550
views
2
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    147
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The possibility of the no-hair theorem being violated

      Preprint

        , 1

      ScienceOpen Preprints

      ScienceOpen

      No-hair theorem, numerical solution, superradiant stability

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recently, one of my articles got some interesting results about Kerr black hole superradiantstability. That result contained some conclusions that violated the \No Hair Theorem". We knowthat the No Hair theorem" is the inference product of general relativity. I boldly believe that itmay lead to a little progress in cosmological research.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          ScienceOpen Preprints
          ScienceOpen
          30 March 2020
          Affiliations
          [1 ] wxchen4277@qq.com
          Article
          10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPJRNRL.v1

          This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .

          Astronomy & Astrophysics

          superradiant stability, numerical solution, No-hair theorem

          Comments

           I submitted the <Superradiant stability of the Kerr black hole> (That paper might violate the black hole no-hair theorem) to the <International Journal of Modern Physics D>(International Journal of Modern Physics D 29(01),DOI: 10.1142/S0218271820500091

          ). Now that the article has been accepted, I wrote an inference about the result of that paper (indicating that if the result is verified to be correct, the no hair theorem may be problematic).

          2020-04-04 04:34 UTC
          +1

          Comment on this article