13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Studies on the effectiveness of coroplast sticky traps for sampling stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae), including a comparison to Alsynite.

      1 ,
      Journal of economic entomology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae), are a blood-feeding pest of cattle worldwide. A new trapping material, Coroplast, was compared with Alsynite sticky traps based on the number, sex, and parity of stable flies caught. Coroplast sticky traps caught more stable flies than Alsynite (trap catches of 2384 versus 753 on 15 traps), with this increase attributed to catching more males (1531 versus 532) and nulliparous females (817 versus 175); parous catches were similar (36 versus 46). The spectral reflectance of Alsynite and Coroplast sticky traps is reported. We also examine Coroplast traps in detail with respect to trap color. Although clean sheets of Alsynite had a higher solar reflectance than Coroplast (90 versus 82% at 450 nm), Coroplast with debris had a higher reflectance than debris-covered Alsynite (62 versus 30% at 450 nm). White Coroplast was most effective, followed by closely by gray. Black and blue were the least effective trapping colors.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Econ. Entomol.
          Journal of economic entomology
          0022-0493
          0022-0493
          Jun 2006
          : 99
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Biology, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough Ontario, Canada.
          Article
          16813346
          597f6a82-fff1-4ccb-9b1e-f3756c55f5fa
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article