5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Motor control exercises, sling exercises, and general exercises for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

      Physical therapy
      Adult, Chronic Disease, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Linear Models, Low Back Pain, rehabilitation, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Pain Measurement, Physical Therapy Modalities, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Exercise benefits patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain; however, the most effective type of exercise remains unknown. This study compared outcomes after motor control exercises, sling exercises, and general exercises for low back pain. This was a randomized controlled trial with a 1-year follow-up. The study was conducted in a primary care setting in Norway. The participants were patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (n=109). The interventions in this study were low-load motor control exercises, high-load sling exercises, or general exercises, all delivered by experienced physical therapists, once a week for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was pain reported on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were self-reported activity limitation (assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index), clinically examined function (assessed with the Fingertip-to-Floor Test), and fear-avoidance beliefs after intervention. The postintervention assessment showed no significant differences among groups with respect to pain (overall group difference) or any of the outcome measures. Mean (95% confidence interval) group differences for pain reduction after treatment and after 1 year were 0.3 (-0.7 to 1.3) and 0.4 (-0.7 to 1.4) for motor control exercises versus sling exercises, 0.7 (-0.6 to 2.0) and 0.3 (-0.8 to 1.4) for sling exercises versus general exercises, and 1.0 (-0.1 to 2.0) and 0.7 (-0.3 to 1.7) for motor control exercises versus general exercises. The nature of the interventions made blinding impossible. This study gave no evidence that 8 treatments with individually instructed motor control exercises or sling exercises were superior to general exercises for chronic low back pain.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article