371
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The new forms of organization of healthcare services entail the development of new clinical practices that are grounded in collaboration. Despite recent advances in research on the subject of collaboration, there is still a need for a better understanding of collaborative processes and for conceptual tools to help healthcare professionals develop collaboration amongst themselves in complex systems. This study draws on D'Amour's structuration model of collaboration to analyze healthcare facilities offering perinatal services in four health regions in the province of Quebec. The objectives are to: 1) validate the indicators of the structuration model of collaboration; 2) evaluate interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in four health regions; and 3) propose a typology of collaboration

          Methods

          A multiple-case research strategy was used. The cases were the healthcare facilities that offer perinatal services in four health regions in the province of Quebec (Canada). The data were collected through 33 semi-structured interviews with healthcare managers and professionals working in the four regions. Written material was also analyzed. The data were subjected to a "mixed" inductive-deductive analysis conducted in two main stages: an internal analysis of each case followed by a cross-sectional analysis of all the cases.

          Results

          The collaboration indicators were shown to be valid, although some changes were made to three of them. Analysis of the data showed great variation in the level of collaboration between the cases and on each dimension. The results suggest a three-level typology of collaboration based on the ten indicators: active collaboration, developing collaboration and potential collaboration.

          Conclusion

          The model and the typology make it possible to analyze collaboration and identify areas for improvement. Researchers can use the indicators to determine the intensity of collaboration and link it to clinical outcomes. Professionals and administrators can use the model to perform a diagnostic of collaboration and implement interventions to intensify it.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The determinants of successful collaboration: a review of theoretical and empirical studies.

          Successful collaboration in health care teams can be attributed to numerous elements, including processes at work in interpersonal relationships within the team (the interactional determinants), conditions within the organization (the organizational determinants), and the organization's environment (the systemic determinants). Through a review of the literature, this article presents a tabulated compilation of each of these determinant types as identified by empirical research and identifies the main characteristics of these determinants according to the conceptual work. We then present a "showcase" of recent Canadian policy initiatives--The Canadian Health Transition Fund (HTF)--to illustrate how the various categories of determinants can be mobilized. The literature review reveals that very little of the empirical work has dealt with determinants of interprofessional collaboration in health, particularly its organizational and systemic determinants. Furthermore, our overview of experience at the Canadian HTF suggests that a systemic approach should be adopted in evaluative research on the determinants of effective collaborative practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative inquire and research design. Choosing among five traductions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central
                1472-6963
                2008
                21 September 2008
                : 8
                : 188
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [3 ]Centre de santé et de services sociaux de Bordeaux-Cartierville-Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada
                [4 ]University Hospital of Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
                [5 ]Public Health Directorate, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                Article
                1472-6963-8-188
                10.1186/1472-6963-8-188
                2563002
                18803881
                59af4aa1-d4d1-47e9-ae8d-3084b505f96b
                Copyright © 2008 D'Amour et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 May 2008
                : 21 September 2008
                Categories
                Research Article

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article