48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of the Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device (PICO) on a Heterogeneous Group of Surgical and Traumatic Wounds

      research-article
      , BSc (Hons), MSc, FRCS (Eng), FRCS (Plast), , RGN, MBE
      Eplasty
      Open Science Company, LLC
      plastic surgery, wound management, negative pressure wound dressing, single use device, early patient discharge

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: Traumatic wounds and surgery inherently have their complications. Localized infections, wound dehiscence, and excessive wound leakage can be devastating to the patient with a prolonged recovery, but it is also costly to the hospital with an increased length of stay, extra workload, and dressing changes. The single use PICO (Smith and Nephew Healthcare, Hull, United Kingdom) negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressing has revolutionized our management of various acute, chronic, and high output wounds. It requires fewer dressing changes than conventional practice, is used in the outpatient setting, and is a necessary adjuvant therapy to hasten wound healing. Aims: To observe the efficacy of the PICO vacuum-assisted healing within a cost improvement programme. Settings: Plastic surgery department, Royal London Hospital. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with a diversity of postoperative or posttraumatic wounds were considered suitable for PICO application and treated totally on an outpatient basis once the PICO dressing was applied. All wounds were then subjected to continued PICO dressings until healed. Results: All patients tolerated the PICO well with no dressing failure or failure to comply. The number of dressings per patient ranged from 1 to 7. The cost per patient of treatment ranged from £120 to £1578. Estimated cost of all PICO dressing for 21 patients including plastic surgery dressing clinic appointments = £13,345. Median length of treatment to healing (days) = 16; standard deviation = 9.5. Eight patients would have had an inpatient bed stay with conventional therapy, total 24 bed days saved at Bartshealth @£325 per day. Conclusions: The outpatient application of a disposable NPWT can benefit a wide range of clinical wounds that optimizes patient care, promotes rapid wound healing, and importantly helps manage costs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience.

          Despite numerous advances, chronic and other difficult-to-manage wounds continue to be a treatment challenge. Presented is a new subatmospheric pressure technique: vacuum-assisted closure (The V.A.C.). The V.A.C. technique entails placing an open-cell foam dressing into the wound cavity and applying a controlled subatmospheric pressure (125 mmHg below ambient pressure). Three hundred wounds were treated: 175 chronic wounds, 94 subacute wounds, and 31 acute wounds. Two hundred ninety-six wounds responded favorably to subatmospheric pressure treatment, with an increased rate of granulation tissue formation. Wounds were treated until completely closed, were covered with a split-thickness skin graft, or a flap was rotated into the health, granulating would bed. The technique removes chronic edema, leading to increased localized blood flow, and the applied forces result in the enhanced formation of granulation tissue. Vacuum-assisted closure is an extremely efficacious modality for treating chronic and difficult wounds.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vacuum-assisted closure: state of clinic art.

            Treatment of wounds has been the cornerstone of plastic surgery since its inception. Vacuum-assisted closure provides a new paradigm that can be used in concert with a wide variety of standard existing plastic surgery techniques. It was originally developed as an alternative treatment for debilitated patients with chronic wounds. It has rapidly evolved into a widely accepted treatment of chronic and acute wounds, contaminated wounds, burns, envenomations, infiltrations, and wound complications from failed operations. The ease of technique and a high rate of success have encouraged its adaptation by thoracic, general, trauma, burn, orthopedic, urologic, as well as plastic surgeons. This article discusses multidisciplinary advances in the use of the vacuum-assisted closure technique over the past 10 years and its status as of 2006. Creative surgeons continue to regularly adapt the system to difficult problems. This technique in trained surgical hands greatly enhances the scope and safety of wound treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of varying levels of subatmospheric pressure on the rate of granulation tissue formation in experimental wounds in swine.

              The use of subatmospheric pressure to promote wound healing has increased in popularity during the last several years. The original studies on granulation tissue formation used a 125-mmHg vacuum. The use of alternative sources of subatmospheric pressure has led to many questions regarding efficacy or risk. In this report a swine model is used to quantify and compare the effects of low vacuum suction (25 mmHg) and high vacuum suction (500 mmHg) produced by various vacuum pumps and wall suction systems with the standard 125-mmHg vacuum. Additionally, the effects of an unregulated air leak in the sealing system were examined. All four wound treatments were examined on each of 4 pigs. Wounds were treated until one of the wounds had granulated to a level flush with the surrounding tissue. Wounds treated with the standard 125-mmHg vacuum had filled with granulation tissue by day 8. At this time wounds treated with 25 mmHg had filled 21.2% with new granulation tissue, and wounds treated with 500 mmHg had filled 5.9% with new tissue. Wounds treated with 125 mmHg with a hole in the sealing drape had increased in size 197% because of the debridement of necrotic tissue. In conclusion, wounds treated with a 125-mmHg vacuum exhibited a significant (p < 0.0001) increase in the rate of granulation tissue formation compared with treatment at 25 mmHg or 500 mmHg. The presence of an unregulated air leak in the sealing drape results in significant progression (p < 0.0001) of the wound secondary to dehydration and progressive necrosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eplasty
                Eplasty
                ePlasty
                Eplasty
                Open Science Company, LLC
                1937-5719
                2014
                28 April 2014
                : 14
                : e20
                Affiliations
                [1]The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust
                Author notes
                Article
                20
                4006427
                24917894
                59ce53b3-fd1c-4c4d-b57f-d74206c6832c
                Copyright © 2014 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Journal Article

                Surgery
                plastic surgery,wound management,negative pressure wound dressing,single use device,early patient discharge

                Comments

                Comment on this article