Death Risk in Hemodialysis Patients: The Predictive Value of Commonly Measured Variables and an Evaluation of Death Rate Differences Between Facilities
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Logistic regression analysis was applied to a sample of more than 12,000 hemodialysis
patients to evaluate the association of various patient descriptors, treatment time
(hours/treatment), and various laboratory tests with the probability of death. Advancing
age, white race, and diabetes were all associated with a significantly increased risk
of death. Short dialysis times were also associated with high death risk before adjustment
for the value of laboratory tests. Of the laboratory variables, low serum albumin
less than 40 g/L (less than 4.0 g/dL) was most highly associated with death probability.
About two thirds of patients had low albumin. These findings suggest that inadequate
nutrition may be an important contributing factor to the mortality suffered by hemodialysis
patients. The relative risk profiles for other laboratory tests are presented. Among
these, low serum creatinine, not high, was associated with high death risk. Both serum
albumin concentration and creatinine were directly correlated with treatment time
so that high values for both substances were associated with long treatment times.
The data suggest that physicians may select patients with high creatinine for more
intense dialysis exposure and patients with low creatinine for less intense treatment.
In a separate analysis, observed death rates were compared with rates expected on
the basis of case mix for these 237 facilities. The data suggest substantial volatility
of observed/expected ratios when facility size is small. Nonetheless, a minority of
facilities (less than or equal to 2%) may have higher rates than expected when compared
with the pool of all patients in this sample. The effect of various laboratory variables
on mortality is substantial, while relatively few facilities have observed death rates
that exceed their expected values. Therefore, we suggest that strategies designed
to improve the overall mortality statistic for dialysis patients in the United States
would be better directed toward improving the quality of care for all patients, particularly
high-risk patients, within their usual treatment settings rather than trying to identify
facilities with high death rate for possible regulatory intervention.