6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool.

      1 , 2 , 3
      Clinical radiology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Breast screening with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) fails to detect 15-30% of cancers. This figure is higher for women with dense breasts. A new tomographic technique in mammography has been developed--digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)--which allows images to be viewed in sections through the breast and has the potential to improve cancer detection rates. Results from retrospective reading studies comparing DBT with FFDM have been largely favourable with improvement in sensitivity and specificity. Increases in diagnostic accuracy have been reported as being independent of breast density; however there are mixed reports regarding the detection of microcalcification. Prospective screening studies using DBT with FFDM have demonstrated increased rates in cancer detection compared with FFDM alone. A reduction in false-positive recall rates has also been shown. Screening with the addition of DBT would approximately double radiation dose; however a simulated FFDM image can be generated from a DBT scan. The combination of simulated FFDM images and DBT is being evaluated within several studies and some positive results have been published. Interval cancer rates for the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) demonstrate the limited sensitivity of FFDM in cancer detection. DBT has the potential to increase sensitivity and decrease false-positive recall rates. It has approval for screening and diagnostics in several countries; however, there are issues with DBT as a screening tool including additional reading time, IT storage and connectivity, over-diagnosis, and cost effectiveness. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness trials are needed before the implementation of DBT in NHSBSP can be considered.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Radiol
          Clinical radiology
          Elsevier BV
          1365-229X
          0009-9260
          Feb 2016
          : 71
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. Electronic address: fjg28@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
          [2 ] Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
          [3 ] National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK; Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7JP, UK.
          Article
          S0009-9260(15)00445-6
          10.1016/j.crad.2015.11.008
          26707815
          5a1d26e7-2fce-41a8-901b-7db2b8932a86
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article