31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The concept of patient engagement in health research has received growing international recognition over recent years. Yet despite some critical advancements, we argue that the concept remains problematic as it negates the very real complexities and context of people’s lives. Though patient engagement conceptually begins to disrupt the identity of “researcher,” and complicate our assumptions and understandings around expertise and knowledge, it continues to essentialize the identity of “patient” as a homogenous group, denying the reality that individuals’ economic, political, cultural, subjective and experiential lives intersect in intricate and multifarious ways.

          Discussion

          Patient engagement approaches that do not consider the simultaneous interactions between different social categories (e.g. race, ethnicity, Indigeneity, gender, class, sexuality, geography, age, ability, immigration status, religion) that make up social identity, as well as the impact of systems and processes of oppression and domination (e.g. racism, colonialism, classism, sexism, ableism, homophobia) exclude the involvement of individuals who often carry the greatest burden of illness — the very voices traditionally less heard in health research. We contend that in order to be a more inclusive and meaningful approach that does not simply reiterate existing health inequities, it is important to reconceptualize patient engagement through a health equity and social justice lens by incorporating a trauma-informed intersectional analysis.

          Summary

          This article provides key concepts to the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis and important questions to consider when developing a patient engagement strategy in health research training, practice and evaluation. In redefining the identity of both “patient” and “researcher,” spaces and opportunities to resist and renegotiate power within the intersubjective relations can be recognized and addressed, in turn helping to build trust, transparency and resiliency — integral to the advancement of the science of patient engagement in health research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Intersectionality and Feminist Politics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            THE INVERSE CARE LAW

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cshimmin@exchange.hsc.mb.ca
                KWittmeier@exchange.hsc.mb.ca
                Josee.Lavoie@umanitoba.ca
                EWicklund@disabilitystudies.ca
                Kathryn.Sibley@umanitoba.ca
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                7 August 2017
                7 August 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 539
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Healthcare Innovation, 753 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6 Canada
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9609, GRID grid.21613.37, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Manitoba, ; 375-753 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6 Canada
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9609, GRID grid.21613.37, , University of Manitoba, Faculty of Community Health Sciences, ; 379-753 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6 Canada
                [4 ]Ongomiizwin- Research, Indigenous Institute of Health and Healing, 715 John Buhler Research Centre-727 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5 Canada
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1703 4731, GRID grid.267457.5, Department of Disability Studies, , University of Winnipeg, ; 515 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9 Canada
                [6 ]GRID grid.427569.b, , Canadian Centre on Disability Studies, ; 226 Osborne Street North, Winnipeg, MB R3J 1T2 Canada
                Article
                2463
                10.1186/s12913-017-2463-1
                5547533
                28784138
                5a27d691-6b78-477c-9061-dd18f8ce0b21
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 24 January 2017
                : 19 July 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Debate
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article