5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification of Frailty in Primary Care: Feasibility and Acceptability of Recommended Case Finding Tools Within a Primary Care Integrated Seniors’ Program

      research-article
      , MD, CCFP (COE) 1 , , MD, CCFP (COE), FCFP, MPH 1 , , MD, MSc 1 , , MEd (HSE) 1 , , PhD 1
      Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
      SAGE Publications
      feasibility, acceptability, frailty case finding tools, primary care

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Case finding for frailty is recommended as part of routine clinical practice. We aimed to test feasibility and acceptability of three recommended case finding tools in primary care as part of an integrated seniors’ program. Method: Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy-7 (PRISMA-7), 4-m walk test, and electronic frailty index (eFI) were used as frailty case finding tools for a target population of community-dwelling seniors ≥65 years of age enrolled in a seniors’ program within an academic primary care clinic in Alberta, Canada. Feasibility was measured by percent completion rate and requirements for training/equipment/space/time, and acceptability by health care providers was measured using focus groups. Results: Eighty-five patients underwent case finding and 16 health care providers participated in the focus groups. Completion rate for PRISMA-7, 4-m walk test, and eFI was 97.6%, 93%, and 100%, respectively. No special training or equipment was required for PRISMA-7; brief training, equipment, and space were required for 4-m walk test. Both tools took less than 5 min to complete. Despite eFI requiring 10 to 20 min/patient chart, providers found it less intrusive. Conclusion: Despite feasibility of the tests, acceptance was higher for tools with minimal clinic interruption, low requirements for resources, and those with added benefit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prognostic significance of potential frailty criteria.

          To determine the independent prognostic effect of seven potential frailty criteria, including five from the Fried phenotype, on several adverse outcomes. Prospective cohort study. Greater New Haven, Connecticut. Seven hundred fifty-four initially nondisabled, community-living persons aged 70 and older. An assessment of seven potential frailty criteria (slow gait speed, low physical activity, weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms) was completed at baseline and every 18 months for 72 months. Participants were followed with monthly telephone interviews for up to 96 months to determine the occurrence of chronic disability, long-term nursing home (NH) stays, injurious falls, and death. In analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, education, number of chronic conditions, and the presence of the other potential frailty criteria, three of the five Fried criteria (slow gait speed, low physical activity, and weight loss) were independently associated with chronic disability, long-term NH stays, and death. Slow gait speed was the strongest predictor of chronic disability (hazard ratio (HR)=2.97, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.32-3.80) and long-term NH stay (HR=3.86, 95% CI=2.23-6.67) and was the only significant predictor of injurious falls (HR=2.19, 95% CI=1.33-3.60). Cognitive impairment was also associated with chronic disability (HR=1.82, 95% CI=1.40-2.38), long-term NH stay (HR=2.64, 95% CI=1.75-3.99), and death (HR=1.54, 95% CI=1.13-2.10), and the magnitude of these associations was comparable with that of weight loss. The results of this study provide strong evidence to support the use of slow gait speed, low physical activity, weight loss, and cognitive impairment as key indicators of frailty while raising concerns about the value of self-reported exhaustion and muscle weakness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Frailty in primary care: a review of its conceptualization and implications for practice

            Frail, older patients pose a challenge to the primary care physician who may often feel overwhelmed by their complex presentation and tenuous health status. At the same time, family physicians are ideally suited to incorporate the concept of frailty into their practice. They have the propensity and skill set that lends itself to patient-centred care, taking into account the individual subtleties of the patient's health within their social context. Tools to identify frailty in the primary care setting are still in the preliminary stages of development. Even so, some practical measures can be taken to recognize frailty in clinical practice and begin to address how its recognition may impact clinical care. This review seeks to address how frailty is recognised and managed, especially in the realm of primary care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Integrated care at home reduces unnecessary hospitalizations of community-dwelling frail older adults: a prospective controlled trial

              Background Care of frail and dependent older adults with multiple chronic conditions is a major challenge for health care systems. The study objective was to test the efficacy of providing integrated care at home to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, emergency room visits, institutionalization, and mortality in community dwelling frail and dependent older adults. Methods A prospective controlled trial was conducted, in real-life clinical practice settings, in a suburban region in Geneva, Switzerland, served by two home visiting nursing service centers. Three hundred and one community-dwelling frail and dependent people over 60 years old were allocated to previously randomized nursing teams into Control (N = 179) and Intervention (N = 122) groups: Controls received usual care by their primary care physician and home visiting nursing services, the Intervention group received an additional home evaluation by a community geriatrics unit with access to a call service and coordinated follow-up. Recruitment began in July 2009, goals were obtained in July 2012, and outcomes assessed until December 2012. Length of follow-up ranged from 5 to 41 months (mean 16.3). Primary outcome measure was the number of hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were reasons for hospitalizations, the number and reason of emergency room visits, institutionalization, death, and place of death. Results The number of hospitalizations did not differ between groups however, the intervention led to lower cumulative incidence for the first hospitalization after the first year of follow-up (69.8%, CI 59.9 to 79.6 versus 87 · 6%, CI 78 · 2 to 97 · 0; p = .01). Secondary outcomes showed that the intervention compared to the control group had less frequent unnecessary hospitalizations (4.1% versus 11.7%, p = .03), lower cumulative incidence for the first emergency room visit, 8.3%, CI 2.6 to 13.9 versus 23.2%, CI 13.1 to 33.3; p = .01), and death occurred more frequently at home (44.4 versus 14.7%; p = .04). No significant differences were found for institutionalization and mortality. Conclusions Integrated care that included a home visiting multidisciplinary geriatric team significantly reduced unnecessary hospitalizations, emergency room visits and allowed more patients to die at home. It is an effective tool to improve coordination and access to care for frail and dependent older adults. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02084108. Retrospectively registered on March 10th 2014.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gerontol Geriatr Med
                Gerontol Geriatr Med
                GGM
                spggm
                Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2333-7214
                15 May 2019
                Jan-Dec 2019
                : 5
                : 2333721419848153
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
                Author notes
                [*]Marjan Abbasi, Department of Family Medicine, University Terrace, 8303 112 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1K4 Email: marjan.abbasi@ 123456albertahealthservices.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-668X
                Article
                10.1177_2333721419848153
                10.1177/2333721419848153
                6540471
                31192278
                5a2b7d9a-7398-4b58-9959-8233449e79f7
                © The Author(s) 2019

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 31 January 2019
                : 4 April 2019
                : 9 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Covenant Health - Network of Excellence in Seniors’ Health and Wellness, ;
                Award ID: Innovation Fund 2015
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2019

                feasibility,acceptability,frailty case finding tools,primary care

                Comments

                Comment on this article