25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of the serum vitamin D level between breastfed and formula-fed infants: several factors which can affect serum vitamin D concentration

      editorial
      , MD, PhD
      Korean Journal of Pediatrics
      The Korean Pediatric Society

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is common knowledge among pediatricians that exclusively breastfed infants should be supplemented with vitamin D (400 IU/day) because human breast milk contains an inadequate amount of vitamin D. Accordingly, Choi et al.1) reported a vitamin deficiency in early infants in a comparative study between breastfed and formula-fed infants in this issue. Although the authors stated some exclusion criteria, the study lacks some guidelines for considerations in the evaluation of vitamin D deficiency, especially those pertaining to factors that can affect the vitamin concentration in the body. Many genetic, dietary, and environmental factors affect the body concentration of vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, and bone metabolism. Therefore, it is recommended that the authors further consider the variable effects of the following conditions. In human skin, 7-dehydrocholesterol is converted into previtamin D3 under ultraviolet (UV)-B radiation (290.315 nm). Previtamin D3 is transformed into vitamin D3 through the heat of the skin. Previtamin D3 then binds to the vitamin D-binding protein and is transported to the liver, where it is converted to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) by 25-hydroxylase. In the kidney, 25(OH)D, the nutritional indicator of vitamin D, is hydroxylated into 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-OH2-D). Vitamin D is an important prehormone involved in many metabolic processes beyond bone integrity and calcium homeostasis2). Most physicians consider 1,25-OH2-D as a key substance to the assessment of vitamin D status. However, measuring 1,25-OH2-D levels as a predictor of vitamin D status can lead to erroneous conclusions because, compared with 25(OH)D levels, 1,25-OH2-D levels can be normal or even elevated despite vitamin D deficiency due to secondary hyperparathyroidism. In exclusively breastfed infants, 25(OH)D serum levels were low during the winter despite supplementation3), whereas serum levels of 1,25-OH2-D and vitamin D-binding protein were higher in the winter than in the summer4). A study performed among pregnant women demonstrated that fetal growth, expressed as femur length, was reduced when the mother had low vitamin D levels during the winter in a high-latitude area5). Breastfed infants are at increased risk of hypovitaminosis D, especially if their mothers are multiparous, have dark skin color, live in high-latitude areas, and are vegetarian6). At high-latitude areas, conditions of low UV-B radiation effectively facilitate vitamin D production in humans with light skin color, thereby preventing vitamin D deficiency7). A light skin color may be required in women to produce relatively high amounts of vitamin D necessary for pregnancy and lactation8). Vitamin D-sufficient foods are limited. Human can take vitamin D through fatty fish, certain fish oils, animal liver, aquatic mammal fat and egg yolks of vitamin D-fed chickens. Human breast milk contains little vitamin D. The watersoluble fraction of cow's milk and human milk did not possess significant antirachitic activity. Whole human milk contains a vitamin D concentration of 15.26 IU/L, of which 12 IU is derived from the lipid fraction. This value is much lower than that in cow milk (204.400 IU/L)9-11). Although an infant is formula fed, it cannot be automatically assumed that the infant is adequately supplied with vitamin D. The daily amount of formula feeding should be taken into consideration. In the study of Choi et al.1), 17.5% of the formula-fed infants were vitamin D deficient. The authors overlooked the feeding amount of the formula. All the infant formulas in Korea contain the minimum required vitamin D concentration of 40 IU/100 kcal (258 IU/L in a 20-kcal/oz formula). Formula-fed infants should ingest nearly 1,000 mL of formula for a vitamin D intake of 400 IU/day. However, very young infants cannot take 1,000 mL of formula a day. Therefore, it is possible that even formula-fed young infants are vitamin D deficient. Breast milk alone can meet the nutrient requirement during the first 6 months of life, with the possible exception of vitamin D. The vitamin A and vitamin E contents of the breast milk are correlated with the amount of the vitamins in the dietary intake of lactating mothers. On the contrary, vitamin D content of the breast milk does not meet the required daily amount for the infants despite adequate dietary supplementation of vitamin D12), because this supplementing does not substantially increase the vitamin D concentration in human milk13). Although nursing mothers were supplemented with 1,000 to 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily, the supplementation had little effect on the vitamin D concentration status of breastfed infants14). The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) previously recommended a daily vitamin D intake of 200 IU for exclusively breast-fed infants. However, this amount is inadequate for maintaining a 25(OH)D concentration of 50 nmol/L in infants. Recently, AAP recommendation of 400 IU/day for vitamin D supplementation was documented to maintain a 25(OH)D serum concentration higher than 50 nmol/L in exclusively breast-fed infants15). In their study, Choi et al.1) made no mention of whether the mothers took vitamin D supplements or ate vitamin-rich food during their pregnancy. When large amounts of vitamin D (1,000 IU/day) are supplemented during the last trimester to achieve 25(OH)D concentrations of 50 nmol/L in pregnant woman, the vitamin D concentration in the cord blood is consequently increased. These findings suggest that a neonate born to a mother with vitamin D deficiency can be expected to be also deficient of the vitamin16). In addition, women with increased skin pigmentation or those with little sunlight exposure are at risk of vitamin D deficiency and may need additional vitamin D supplementation, especially during pregnancy and lactation. Therefore, those who provide care for pregnant women and the pediatric population should take these factors into consideration. Despite severe maternal vitamin D deficiency, fetal rickets may rarely develop. However, rickets may manifest at birth. Therefore, daily supplementation with 400 IU of vitamin D during the last trimester of pregnancy has been practiced, albeit with minimal effect on circulating 25(OH)D concentrations in the mother and infant at term. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that infants born to unsupplemented vitamin D-deficient mothers were likely to have early vitamin D deficiency compared with those whose mothers were supplemented with vitamin D during pregnancy. A Canadian study that evaluated serum vitamin D and mineral levels among infants reported that newborns whose mothers had adequate intakes of milk and vitamin D during pregnancy showed increased birth weight but not head circumference or length at birth17). The differences in body weight percentile between the breastfed and formula-fed groups indicated no statistical significance. The authors did not take into consideration the height profiles of the newborns even if minerals and vitamin D are key factors of bony growth. If the height percentile differences between the 2 groups had been compared, the results would have been different. Moreover, the authors included in the study preterm or small-for-gestational age infants, which comprised 11% of the whole study group. It would have been better if this group was excluded in the study. Given that the uterus allows transfer of sufficient amount of 25(OH)D during the prenatal period, especially during the final 3 months of pregnancy, infants born near or at term have higher levels of circulating 25(OH)D than preterm infants. With respect to prenatal supplementation, the generally prescribed daily intake of 400 IU of vitamin D is not sufficient to achieve the optimal vitamin D status in newborns18). Many research reports on vitamin D, which is important for bony metabolism and immunity, and has beneficial effects on diverse organs, have been published recently. Vitamin D concentration is affected by many genetic, dietary, and environmental factors; therefore, it is recommended that researchers consider the relative and effective factors when performing studies concerning vitamin D concentrations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The evolution of human skin coloration.

          Skin color is one of the most conspicuous ways in which humans vary and has been widely used to define human races. Here we present new evidence indicating that variations in skin color are adaptive, and are related to the regulation of ultraviolet (UV) radiation penetration in the integument and its direct and indirect effects on fitness. Using remotely sensed data on UV radiation levels, hypotheses concerning the distribution of the skin colors of indigenous peoples relative to UV levels were tested quantitatively in this study for the first time. The major results of this study are: (1) skin reflectance is strongly correlated with absolute latitude and UV radiation levels. The highest correlation between skin reflectance and UV levels was observed at 545 nm, near the absorption maximum for oxyhemoglobin, suggesting that the main role of melanin pigmentation in humans is regulation of the effects of UV radiation on the contents of cutaneous blood vessels located in the dermis. (2) Predicted skin reflectances deviated little from observed values. (3) In all populations for which skin reflectance data were available for males and females, females were found to be lighter skinned than males. (4) The clinal gradation of skin coloration observed among indigenous peoples is correlated with UV radiation levels and represents a compromise solution to the conflicting physiological requirements of photoprotection and vitamin D synthesis. The earliest members of the hominid lineage probably had a mostly unpigmented or lightly pigmented integument covered with dark black hair, similar to that of the modern chimpanzee. The evolution of a naked, darkly pigmented integument occurred early in the evolution of the genus Homo. A dark epidermis protected sweat glands from UV-induced injury, thus insuring the integrity of somatic thermoregulation. Of greater significance to individual reproductive success was that highly melanized skin protected against UV-induced photolysis of folate (Branda & Eaton, 1978, Science201, 625-626; Jablonski, 1992, Proc. Australas. Soc. Hum. Biol.5, 455-462, 1999, Med. Hypotheses52, 581-582), a metabolite essential for normal development of the embryonic neural tube (Bower & Stanley, 1989, The Medical Journal of Australia150, 613-619; Medical Research Council Vitamin Research Group, 1991, The Lancet338, 31-37) and spermatogenesis (Cosentino et al., 1990, Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.87, 1431-1435; Mathur et al., 1977, Fertility Sterility28, 1356-1360).As hominids migrated outside of the tropics, varying degrees of depigmentation evolved in order to permit UVB-induced synthesis of previtamin D(3). The lighter color of female skin may be required to permit synthesis of the relatively higher amounts of vitamin D(3)necessary during pregnancy and lactation. Skin coloration in humans is adaptive and labile. Skin pigmentation levels have changed more than once in human evolution. Because of this, skin coloration is of no value in determining phylogenetic relationships among modern human groups. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride

            (1997)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in a cohort of breastfeeding mothers and their infants: a 6-month follow-up pilot study.

              To examine the effect of high-dose maternal vitamin D(3) (vitD) supplementation on the nutritional vitD status of breastfeeding (BF) women and their infants compared with maternal and infant controls receiving 400 and 300 IU vitD/day, respectively. Fully lactating women (n = 19) were enrolled at 1-month postpartum into a randomized- control pilot trial. Each mother received one of two treatments for a 6-month study period: 0 or 6000 IU vitD(3) plus a prenatal vitamin containing 400 IU vitD(3). The infants of mothers assigned to the control group received 300 IU vitD(3)/day; those infants of mothers in the high-dose group received 0 IU (placebo). Maternal serum and milk vitD and 25(OH)D were measured at baseline then monthly; infant serum vitD and 25(OH)D were measured at baseline, and months 4 and 7. Urinary calcium/creatinine ratios were measured monthly in both mothers and infants. Dietary and BF history and outdoor activity questionnaires were completed at each visit. Changes in skin pigmentation were measured by spectrophotometry. Data were analyzed using chi-square, t-test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) on an intent-to-treat basis. High-dose (6400 IU/day) vitD(3) safely and significantly increased maternal circulating 25(OH)D and vitD from baseline compared to controls (p < 0.0028 and 0.0043, respectively). Mean milk antirachitic activity of mothers receiving 400 IU vitD/day decreased to a nadir of 45.6 at visit four and varied little during the study period (45.6-78.6 IU/L), whereas the mean activity in the 6400 IU/day group increased from 82 to 873 IU/L (p < 0.0003). There were no differences in circulating 25(OH)D levels of infants supplemented with oral vitD versus infants whose only source of vitD was breast milk. With limited sun exposure, an intake of 400 IU/day vitamin D(3) did not sustain circulating maternal 25(OH)D levels, and thus, supplied only extremely limited amounts of vitamin D to the nursing infant via breast milk. Infant levels achieved exclusively through maternal supplementation were equivalent to levels in infants who received oral vitamin D supplementation. Thus, a maternal intake of 6400 IU/day vitamin D elevated circulating 25(OH)D in both mother and nursing infant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Pediatr
                Korean J Pediatr
                KJP
                Korean Journal of Pediatrics
                The Korean Pediatric Society
                1738-1061
                2092-7258
                May 2013
                28 May 2013
                : 56
                : 5
                : 202-204
                Affiliations
                Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Yong Joo Kim, MD, PhD. Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-791, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2290-8390, Tel: +82-2-2297-2380, kyjoo@ 123456hanyang.ac.kr
                Article
                10.3345/kjp.2013.56.5.202
                3668200
                23741233
                5a2cf401-e785-4e6c-959e-33df397f028d
                Copyright © 2013 by The Korean Pediatric Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 April 2013
                : 25 April 2013
                Categories
                Editorial

                Pediatrics
                Pediatrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article