1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trends in Prices of Popular Brand-Name Prescription Drugs in the United States

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , BA 1 , , MD 1 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What are the prices of top-selling brand-name prescription drugs in the United States, and how have these prices changed in recent years?

          Findings

          In this economic evaluation of 49 common top-selling brand-name drugs, 78% of the drugs that have been available since 2012 have seen an increase in insurer and out-of-pocket costs by more than 50%, and 44% have more than doubled in price.

          Meaning

          Prices of brand-name drugs in the United States are likely to continue to increase, which warrants greater price transparency.

          Abstract

          Importance

          High and continually increasing pharmaceutical drug spending is a major health and health policy concern in the United States.

          Objective

          To demonstrate trends in prices among popular brand-name prescription drugs.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This economic evaluation of drug prices focuses on 49 top-selling brand-name medications in the United States. Pharmacy claims data from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017, were obtained from Blue Cross Blue Shield Axis, a database that includes data from more than 35 million individuals with private pharmaceutical insurance. Drugs that exceeded $500 million in US sales or $1 billion in worldwide sales were examined.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The median sum of out-of-pocket and insurance costs paid by patients or insurers for common prescriptions, presented annually and monthly, was the primary outcome.

          Results

          In total, 132 brand-name prescription drugs were identified in 2017 that met the inclusion criteria. Of this total, the study focused on 49 top-selling drugs that exceeded 100 000 pharmacy claims. Substantial cost increases among these drugs was near universal, with a 76% median cost increase from January 2012 through December 2017, and almost all drugs (48 [98%]) displaying regular annual or biannual price increases. Of the 36 drugs that have been available since 2012, 28 (78%) have seen an increase in insurer and out-of-pocket costs by more than 50%, and 16 (44%) have more than doubled in price. Insulins (ie, Novolog, Humalog, and Lantus) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (ie, Humira and Enbrel) demonstrated highly correlated price increases, coinciding with some of the largest growth in drug costs. Relative price changes did not differ between drugs that entered the market in the past 3 to 6 years and those that have been on the market longer (number of drugs, 13 vs 36; median, 29% increase from January 2015 through December 2017; P = .81) nor between drugs with or without a Food and Drug Administration–approved therapeutic equivalent (number of drugs, 17 vs 32; median, 79% vs 73%; P = .21). Changes in prices paid were highly correlated with third-party estimates of changes in drug net prices (ρ = 0.55; P = 3.8 × 10 −5), suggesting that the current rebate system, which incentivizes high list prices and greater reliance on rebates, increases overall costs.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The growth of drug spending in the United States associated with government-protected market exclusivity is likely to continue; greater price transparency is warranted.

          Abstract

          This economic evaluation study uses pharmaceutical insurance claims data to report the consistent rise in prices of commonly used prescription medicines in the United States.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          It’s Still The Prices, Stupid: Why The US Spends So Much On Health Care, And A Tribute To Uwe Reinhardt

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Association of Prescription Drug Price Rebates in Medicare Part D With Patient Out-of-Pocket and Federal Spending

            The increasing cost of prescription drugs is a burden for patients and threatens the financial stability of the US health care system. Rebates are a form of price concession paid by a pharmaceutical manufacturer to the health plan sponsor or the pharmacy benefit manager working on the plan’s behalf. Proponents argue that rebates result from vigorous negotiations that help lower overall drug costs. Critics argue that rebates have perversely increased the costs patients pay out of pocket, as well as the costs for Medicare as a whole. This special communication discusses how the availability of rebates for drugs covered by the Medicare Part D program may raise costs for patients and Medicare while increasing the profits of Part D plan sponsors and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Two policy alternatives are herein proposed that would reconfigure cost sharing to lower patient out-of-pocket costs and reduce cost shifting to Medicare.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Prescription Drugs—List Price, Net Price, and the Rebate Caught in the Middle

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                31 May 2019
                May 2019
                31 May 2019
                : 2
                : 5
                : e194791
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Translational Institute, Scripps Research, La Jolla, California
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 9, 2019.
                Published: May 31, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4791
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Wineinger NE et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Eric J. Topol, MD, Translational Institute, Scripps Research, 3344 N Torrey Pines Ct, La Jolla, CA 92037 ( etopol@ 123456scripps.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Wineinger and Topol had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: All authors.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Wineinger, Topol.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Wineinger, Zhang.
                Obtained funding: Topol.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Wineinger, Topol.
                Supervision: Wineinger.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Topol reported personal fees from Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) outside of the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by UL1 TR002550 Clinical and Translational Science Award from the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: Authors participate in the BCBS Alliance for Health Research, established by the BCBS Association to engage researchers in collaborative efforts to use a limited data set drawn from BCBS companies to explore critical health care issues to improve the health of Americans. The BCBS Alliance for Health Research provides researchers with use of a secure data portal to access a limited data set from BCBS Axis. The BCBS Association did not provide funding to researchers. The authors acknowledge and thank Scott Hinds, MS, and Richard Evans, founder and general manager, at SSR Health for providing drug net price data. These individuals received no compensation for their contribution.
                Article
                zoi190202
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4791
                6547085
                31150077
                5a338f5d-120c-4548-ae78-b12c1bc0736b
                Copyright 2019 Wineinger NE et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 17 December 2018
                : 8 April 2019
                : 9 April 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article