10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rapid analysis of bacterial composition in prosthetic joint infection by 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common cause of arthroplasty failure. However, infection is often difficult to detect by conventional bacterial cultures, for which false-negative rates are 23% to 35%. In contrast, 16S rRNA metagenomics has been shown to quantitatively detect unculturable, unsuspected, and unviable pathogens. In this study, we investigated the use of 16S rRNA metagenomics for detection of bacterial pathogens in synovial fluid (SF) from patients with hip or knee PJI.

          Methods

          We analyzed the bacterial composition of 22 SF samples collected from 11 patients with PJIs (first- and second-stage surgery). The V3 and V4 region of bacteria was assessed by comparing the taxonomic distribution of the 16S rDNA amplicons with microbiome sequencing analysis. We also compared the results of bacterial detection from different methods including 16S metagenomics, traditional cultures, and targeted Sanger sequencing.

          Results

          Polymicrobial infections were not only detected, but also characterized at different timepoints corresponding to first- and second-stage exchange arthroplasty. Similar taxonomic distributions were obtained by matching sequence data against SILVA, Greengenes, and The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). All bacteria isolated from the traditional culture could be further identified by 16S metagenomics and targeted Sanger sequencing.

          Conclusion

          The data highlight 16S rRNA metagenomics as a suitable and promising method to detect and identify infecting bacteria, most of which may be uncultivable. Importantly, the method dramatically reduces turnaround time to two days rather than approximately one week for conventional cultures.

          Cite this article: M-F. Chen, C-H. Chang, C. Chiang-Ni, P-H. Hsieh, H-N. Shih, S. W. N. Ueng, Y. Chang. Rapid analysis of bacterial composition in prosthetic joint infection by 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:367–377. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.88.BJR-2019-0003.R2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with histoplasmosis: 2007 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          Evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with histoplasmosis were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace the previous treatment guidelines published in 2000 (Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:688-95). The guidelines are intended for use by health care providers who care for patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them. Since 2000, several new antifungal agents have become available, and clinical trials and case series have increased our understanding of the management of histoplasmosis. Advances in immunosuppressive treatment for inflammatory disorders have created new questions about the approach to prevention and treatment of histoplasmosis. New information, based on publications from the period 1999-2006, are incorporated into this guideline document. In addition, the panel added recommendations for management of histoplasmosis in children for those aspects that differ from aspects in adults.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection.

            Culturing of samples of periprosthetic tissue is the standard method used for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection, but this method is neither sensitive nor specific. In prosthetic-joint infection, microorganisms are typically present in a biofilm on the surface of the prosthesis. We hypothesized that culturing of samples obtained from the prosthesis would improve the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection. We performed a prospective trial comparing culture of samples obtained by sonication of explanted hip and knee prostheses to dislodge adherent bacteria from the prosthesis with conventional culture of periprosthetic tissue for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection among patients undergoing hip or knee revision or resection arthroplasty. We studied 331 patients with total knee prostheses (207 patients) or hip prostheses (124 patients); 252 patients had aseptic failure, and 79 had prosthetic-joint infection. With the use of standardized nonmicrobiologic criteria to define prosthetic-joint infection, the sensitivities of periprosthetic-tissue and sonicate-fluid cultures were 60.8% and 78.5% (P<0.001), respectively, and the specificities were 99.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Fourteen cases of prosthetic-joint infection were detected by sonicate-fluid culture but not by prosthetic-tissue culture. In patients receiving antimicrobial therapy within 14 days before surgery, the sensitivities of periprosthetic tissue and sonicate-fluid culture were 45.0% and 75.0% (P<0.001), respectively. In this study, culture of samples obtained by sonication of prostheses was more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic-tissue culture for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic hip and knee infection, especially in patients who had received antimicrobial therapy within 14 days before surgery. Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              SILVA, RDP, Greengenes, NCBI and OTT — how do these taxonomies compare?

              Background A key step in microbiome sequencing analysis is read assignment to taxonomic units. This is often performed using one of four taxonomic classifications, namely SILVA, RDP, Greengenes or NCBI. It is unclear how similar these are and how to compare analysis results that are based on different taxonomies. Results We provide a method and software for mapping taxonomic entities from one taxonomy onto another. We use it to compare the four taxonomies and the Open Tree of life Taxonomy (OTT). Conclusions While we find that SILVA, RDP and Greengenes map well into NCBI, and all four map well into the OTT, mapping the two larger taxonomies on to the smaller ones is problematic. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3501-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Assistant Researcher
                Role: Attending Physician
                Role: Associate Professor
                Role: Attending Physician
                Role: Attending Physician
                Role: Professor and Superintendent Emeritus
                Role: Attending Physician, Chief, and Professor
                Journal
                Bone Joint Res
                Bone & Joint Research
                2046-3758
                August 2019
                3 September 2019
                : 8
                : 8
                : 367-377
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [2 ]Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University. Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [3 ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University; Molecular Infectious Disease Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [4 ]Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [5 ]Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [6 ]Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [7 ]Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
                Author notes
                [*]Y. Chang; email: yhchang@ 123456cgmh.org.tw
                Article
                10.1302_2046-3758.88.BJR-2019-0003.R2
                10.1302/2046-3758.88.BJR-2019-0003.R2
                6719533
                31537994
                5a4cdbdf-381c-4e13-966f-73ed722aed33
                © 2019 Author(s) et al.

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Infection
                9
                Prosthetic joint infection
                16S metagenomics
                Synovial fluid
                Bacterial composition
                Polymicrobial infection

                prosthetic joint infection,16s metagenomics,synovial fluid,bacterial composition,polymicrobial infection

                Comments

                Comment on this article