47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Accurate Identification of ALK Positive Lung Carcinoma Patients: Novel FDA-Cleared Automated Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Scanning System and Ultrasensitive Immunohistochemistry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Based on the excellent results of the clinical trials with ALK-inhibitors, the importance of accurately identifying ALK positive lung cancer has never been greater. However, there are increasing number of recent publications addressing discordances between FISH and IHC. The controversy is further fuelled by the different regulatory approvals. This situation prompted us to investigate two ALK IHC antibodies (using a novel ultrasensitive detection-amplification kit) and an automated ALK FISH scanning system (FDA-cleared) in a series of non-small cell lung cancer tumor samples.

          Methods

          Forty-seven ALK FISH-positive and 56 ALK FISH-negative NSCLC samples were studied. All specimens were screened for ALK expression by two IHC antibodies (clone 5A4 from Novocastra and clone D5F3 from Ventana) and for ALK rearrangement by FISH (Vysis ALK FISH break-apart kit), which was automatically captured and scored by using Bioview's automated scanning system.

          Results

          All positive cases with the IHC antibodies were FISH-positive. There was only one IHC-negative case with both antibodies which showed a FISH-positive result. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the IHC in comparison with FISH were 98% and 100%, respectively.

          Conclusions

          The specificity of these ultrasensitive IHC assays may obviate the need for FISH confirmation in positive IHC cases. However, the likelihood of false negative IHC results strengthens the case for FISH testing, at least in some situations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ALK rearrangements are mutually exclusive with mutations in EGFR or KRAS: an analysis of 1,683 patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

          Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several case reports and small series have reported that ALK rearrangements can overlap with other oncogenic drivers in NSCLC in crizotinib-naïve and crizotinib-resistant cancers. We reviewed clinical genotyping data from 1,683 patients with NSCLC and investigated the prevalence of concomitant EGFR or KRAS mutations among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. We also examined biopsy specimens from 34 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC after the development of resistance to crizotinib. Screening identified 301 (17.8%) EGFR mutations, 465 (27.6%) KRAS mutations, and 75 (4.4%) ALK rearrangements. EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements were mutually exclusive. Four patients with KRAS mutations were found to have abnormal ALK FISH patterns, most commonly involving isolated 5' green probes. Sufficient tissue was available for confirmatory ALK immunohistochemistry in 3 cases, all of which were negative for ALK expression. Among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who acquired resistance to crizotinib, repeat biopsy specimens were ALK FISH positive in 29 of 29 (100%) cases. Secondary mutations in the ALK kinase domain and ALK gene amplification were observed in 7 of 34 (20.6%) and 3 of 29 (10.3%) cases, respectively. No EGFR or KRAS mutations were identified among any of the 25 crizotinib-resistant, ALK-positive patients with sufficient tissue for testing. Functional ALK rearrangements were mutually exclusive with EGFR and KRAS mutations in a large Western patient population. This lack of overlap was also observed in ALK-positive cancers with acquired resistance to crizotinib. ©2013 AACR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology.

            To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed. Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies. Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation. Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4). The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: biologic and methodologic considerations.

              The goal of this review is to systematically address a number of issues raised in the American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) guidelines on testing for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) alteration. A group of investigators who are experienced in the conduct and interpretation of HER-2 assay methods reviewed the ASCO-CAP guidelines and address several areas of the HER-2 testing guidelines with a particular emphasis on biologic and methodologic considerations. Although HER-2 status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the status determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) are significantly correlated, we feel that standard considerations of laboratory testing, including test accuracy, reproducibility, and precision, as well as the current data favor FISH over IHC assay methods for determining HER-2 status. These considerations are clearly important in clinical practice because HER2 amplification is directly linked to protein expression levels in breast cancer. However, this protein is not consistently analyzed in formalin-fixed tissues as a result of variability in fixation methods and times and the impact of fixation on HER-2 protein antigenicity. Conversely, gene amplification and FISH are significantly less dependent on tissue fixation methods, making this assay more reproducible between central and peripheral laboratories than IHC. Moreover, review of the existing data demonstrate that FISH is more strongly correlated with responsiveness to either trastuzumab or lapatinib treatment. Until other methods achieve similar test accuracy, reproducibility, and predictive value, we suggest FISH as the primary HER-2 testing modality for women with breast cancer who are candidates for HER-2-targeted therapies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                23 September 2014
                : 9
                : 9
                : e107200
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratorio de Dianas Terapéuticas, Centro Integral Oncológico “Clara Campal”, Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain
                [2 ]Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
                [3 ]C.H.U. A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
                [4 ]Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
                [5 ]IdiPAZ (Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research), University Hospital La Paz, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
                [6 ]Hospital Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
                [7 ]C.H.U. Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [8 ]Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
                [9 ]Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
                [10 ]Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
                [11 ]Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
                [12 ]Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
                [13 ]Oncology Department, Centro Integral Oncológico “Clara Campal”, Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain
                Istituto dei tumori Fondazione Pascale, Italy
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: E. Conde and J. Gómez-Román: honoraria, Pfizer. M. Salido: Advisory Board, Pfizer. E. Arriola: Advisory Board and Research Funding, Pfizer. F. López-Ríos: Advisory Board and Research Funding, Pfizer. Research funding: Abbott and Ventana Medical Systems. Ventana Medical Systems provided reagents free of charge. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: EC FL-R. Performed the experiments: EC FL-R AS-G. Analyzed the data: EC AS-G AB PG RG-C MB LP-A DH JC MCC DR-A IA JR NR MS LP EA JS VF NV JG-R MH FL-R. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EC AS-G AB PG RG-C MB LP-A DH JC MCC DR-A IA JR NR MS LP EA JS VF NV JG-R MH FL-R. Wrote the paper: EC AS-G AB PG RG-C MB LP-A DH JC MCC DR-A IA JR NR MS LP EA JS VF NV JG-R MH FL-R.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-25319
                10.1371/journal.pone.0107200
                4172507
                25248157
                5a5123ee-da88-4fda-8a59-76fcc6bb3cf0
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 June 2014
                : 7 August 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                This work was partially supported by Abbott, Pfizer, Fundación Mutua Madrileña and Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (PI11/02866). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Lung and Intrathoracic Tumors
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Anatomical Pathology
                Histopathology
                Molecular Pathology
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article