10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      327. Comparison of Clinical Outcome, Causative Serotypes, and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities Between Pneumococcal Meningitis and Pneumococcal Bacteremic Pneumonia in Adult Patients in the Republic of Korea

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pneumococcal meningitis (PM) is one of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and is considered as a medical emergency with notable morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to characterize differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes, pneumococcal serotypes, and antimicrobial susceptibilities between PM and pneumococcal bacteremic pneumonia (PBP) in adult patients in the Republic of Korea (ROK) from a prospective observational cohort.

          Methods

          Adult IPD cases (≥18 years) were prospectively collected from 20 hospitals participated in the pneumococcal surveillance program in the ROK from 2013 through 2015. Serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed by a multiplexed serotyping assay and Microscan system, respectively.

          Results

          During the study period, 30 cases of PM and 205 cases of PBP were compared. Serotypes 19A, 15B/15C, and 35B were the most prevalent among PM cases, whereas serotypes 3, 11A/D/F, and 19A were the most common serotypes in PBP. There were significant female predominance (46.7% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.022), younger age (56.7% vs. 36.1%, P = 0.031), less immunocompromised states (3.3% vs. 28.8%, P = 0.005), less underlying chronic lung diseases (3.3% vs. 16.6%, P = 0.04), and lower mortality rate (16.7% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.004) in PM, compared with PBP. However, PM cases showed higher penicillin resistance (76.7% vs. 19.2%, P < 0.001), and ceftriaxone resistance (53.3% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001), consistent with higher MDR prevalence in PM cases (76.7% vs. 53.2 P = 0.016). All PM cases except for three cases received empiric or definite vancomycin treatment. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that penicillin resistance (odds ratio [OR] 15.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.82–64.72, P < 0.001) and survival (OR 20.73, 95% CI 3.1–136.74, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with PM.

          Conclusion

          This study indicates that adult PM showed favorable clinical outcomes, compared with PBP, despite of differences in clinical characteristics.

          Disclosures

          All authors: No reported disclosures.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          November 2018
          26 November 2018
          26 November 2018
          : 5
          : Suppl 1 , ID Week 2018 Abstracts
          : S131
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [2 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [3 ]School of Medicine, Chosun University, gwang ju, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [4 ]Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [5 ]Chungnam National University School Of Medicine, Daejon, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [6 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [7 ]Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju-si, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [8 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [9 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [10 ]Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [11 ]Infectious Disease, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [12 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [13 ]Sahmyook Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [14 ]Youngnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [15 ]Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
          [16 ]Division of Infectious Disease, Depart of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
          Article
          ofy210.338
          10.1093/ofid/ofy210.338
          6253869
          5a60c122-d2c6-4c3c-a27f-c45f563fbb7a
          © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Poster Abstracts

          Comments

          Comment on this article