12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The welfare state distributes financial resources to its citizens – protecting them in times of adversity. Variations in how such social protection policies are administered have been attributed to important differences in population health. The aim of this systematic review of reviews is to update and appraise the evidence base of the effects of social protection policies on health inequalities. Methods/design: Systematic review methodology was used. Nine databases were searched from 2007 to 2017 for reviews of social policy interventions in high-income countries. Quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. Results: Six systematic reviews were included in our review, reporting 50 unique primary studies. Two reviews explored income maintenance and poverty relief policies and found some, low quality, evidence that increased unemployment benefit generosity may improve population mental health. Four reviews explored active labour-market policies and found some, low-quality evidence, that return to work initiatives may lead to short-term health improvements, but that in the longer term, they can lead to declines in mental health. The more rigorously conducted reviews found no significant health effects of any of social protection policy under investigation. No reviews of family policies were located. Conclusions: The systematic review evidence base of the effects of social protection policy interventions remains sparse, of low quality, of limited generalizability (as the evidence base is concentrated in the Anglo-Saxon welfare state type), and relatively inconclusive. There is a clear need for evaluations in more diverse welfare state settings and particularly of family policies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
          Scand J Public Health
          SAGE Publications
          1403-4948
          1651-1905
          October 10 2018
          August 2019
          May 09 2019
          August 2019
          : 47
          : 6
          : 655-665
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, UK
          [2 ]Fuse – UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK
          [3 ]Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, UK
          [4 ]School of Public Health, Midwifery & Social Work, Canterbury Christ Church University, UK
          [5 ]Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway
          [6 ]Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, Spain
          Article
          10.1177/1403494819848276
          31068103
          5a6d10f4-e2ef-4ed1-97d8-67a42c6a6151
          © 2019

          http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article