5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer achieves a high rate of R0 resection*

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d15087750e208">Background</h5> <p id="P1">To assess local control, survival, and conversion to resectability among locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients treated with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d15087750e213">Material and Methods</h5> <p id="P2">Between 2007 and 2012, 134 LAPC patients were treated with ICT followed by IMRT. After chemoradiotherapy, 40 patients received maintenance chemotherapy. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d15087750e218">Results</h5> <p id="P3">With a median follow-up of 20 months, median overall survival (OS) was 23 months. One-year and 2-year OS was 85% and 47%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, progression of disease after IMRT was associated with worse overall survival. Cumulative incidence of local failure was 10% at 1 year and 36% at 2 years. Twenty-six patients (19%) underwent resection after chemoradiotherapy including 22 patients (85%) with negative margins. On multivariate analysis, response to IMRT was associated with surgery (p=0.01). Acute grade 3–4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity rates were 26% and 4.5%, respectively. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d15087750e223">Conclusion</h5> <p id="P4">IMRT is safe in patients with LAPC. Patients with non-progressive LAPC after ICT and who received IMRT had high rates of local control and prolonged survival. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Focal Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation Improves Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Induction Chemotherapy and Consolidative Chemoradiation

          To review outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients treated with dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with curative intent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase II and III studies.

            The management of locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer patients remains controversial. To select patients who could benefit from chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the therapeutic strategy used by the Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) consisted of initial chemotherapy (CT) for at least 3 months. The decision to administer CRT or continue CT in nonprogressive patients was the investigator's choice. Retrospective analysis of outcome in 181 patients with LA pancreatic cancer (76 women and 105 men; mean age, 61 years; range, 37 to 85 years) enrolled onto prospective phase II and III GERCOR studies was performed to compare the survival of patients who received CRT with that of patients who continued CT alone. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times for the 181 patients were 6.3 and 11.4 months, respectively. Fifty-three patients (29.3%) had metastatic disease after 3 months of CT and were not eligible for CRT. Among the 128 remaining patients (70.3%) who had no disease progression and who were, therefore, eligible for CRT, 72 (56%) received CRT (group A), whereas 56 (44%) continued with CT (group B). The two groups were balanced for initial characteristics (performance status, sex, age, and type of CT), as well as for induction CT results. In groups A and B, the median PFS times were 10.8 and 7.4 months, respectively (P = .005), and the median OS times were 15.0 and 11.7 months, respectively (P = .0009). These results suggest that, after control of disease by initial CT, CRT could significantly improve survival in patients with LA pancreatic cancer compared with CT alone. A prospective phase III study is ongoing to evaluate this strategy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center experience.

              The objective of our retrospective institutional experience is to report the overall response rate, R0 resection rate, progression-free survival, and safety/toxicity of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients with LAPC treated with FOLFIRINOX were identified via the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center pharmacy database. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and safety/tolerability data were compiled. Formal radiographic review was performed to determine overall response rates (ORRs). Twenty-two patients with LAPC began treatment with FOLFIRINOX between July 2010 and February 2012. The ORR was 27.3%, and the median progression-free survival was 11.7 months. Five of 22 patients were able to undergo R0 resections following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation. Three of the five patients have experienced distant recurrence within 5 months. Thirty-two percent of patients required at least one emergency department visit or hospitalization while being treated with FOLFIRINOX. FOLFIRINOX possesses substantial activity in patients with LAPC. The use of FOLFIRINOX was associated with conversion to resectability in >20% of patients. However, the recurrences following R0 resection in three of five patients and the toxicities observed with the use of this regimen raise important questions about how to best treat patients with LAPC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Oncologica
                Acta Oncologica
                Informa UK Limited
                0284-186X
                1651-226X
                February 17 2017
                March 04 2017
                October 31 2016
                March 04 2017
                : 56
                : 3
                : 384-390
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, University Pierre and Marie Curie Paris VI, Paris, France;
                [2 ] Department of Radiation Oncology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;
                [3 ] Department of Radiology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;
                [4 ] Department of Biostatistics at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;
                [5 ] Department of Medical Oncology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;
                [6 ] Department of Surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;
                [7 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
                Article
                10.1080/0284186X.2016.1245862
                5644019
                27796165
                5a780ab7-496d-4433-8d43-1efe21a7122a
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article