18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effects of 2 genetic lines on spatial distribution and use and preference of perch and nest area in an aviary system

      research-article
      , 1 , ,
      Poultry Science
      Elsevier
      laying hens, aviary systems, perch use

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The objective of this trial was to evaluate spatial distribution, nest and perch usage, and preference of Lohmann Brown ( BH) and Bovan White ( WH) Leghorn hens raised in an aviary system. At 5 wk, 400 floor raised pullets, BH and WH strains, in equal numbers, were placed into 8 modified Big Dutchman Natura aviary units. Each aviary unit had 3 tiers with perches and an indoor litter area. At 25 wk, the number of birds was recorded by scan sampling every 4 h. The number of birds perching in each aviary unit was recorded every 4 h at 15, 25, and 35 wk. The number of eggs laid was recorded daily from 22 to 53 wk. A split-plot factorial design with Poisson distribution was used for analysis of spatial distribution and perch preference. Nest and perch usage was analyzed using a split-plot factorial design with binomial distribution. There was an interaction ( P < 0.0001) indicating that during late afternoon and night, a higher number of WH were observed in the middle and top tier while a higher number of BH were observed in the litter area and bottom tier at 25 wk. The odds of observing WH perching were higher than the odds of observing BH perching during late morning, late afternoon, and night at 15 wk, from early afternoon to night at 25 wk, and during all afternoon at 35 wk. WH had higher nest usage than BH expressed by the higher odds of observing eggs from the nest area ( P = 0.071). There was a strain and egg location interaction ( P < 0.0001) for number of eggs laid indicating that WH were laying more eggs in the nest area and litter floor area compared to BH, whereas BH were laying more eggs in the metal aviary wire tiers in comparison with WH. In conclusion, WH showed greater degree of adaptation to aviary systems than BH expressed by greater usage of perches and nest areas and elevated tiers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Explaining odds ratios.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Providing laying hens with perches: fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury?

            1. The EU laying hen directive, which bans standard battery cages from 2012, has implications for animal welfare, particularly since housing laying hens in extensive systems, while increasing natural behaviour and improving bone strength, is associated with a greater level of bone fractures, predominantly of the keel bone, compared to birds housed in cages. 2. The aetiology and welfare consequences of keel and other bone fractures are not well understood and could have important implications for housing system designs. While proposed alterations to layer housing are based on the desire to fulfil behavioural needs and increase bone strength, there appears to have been little consideration of the effect of system on potential injury. 3. In addition, there are variations in how the directive is interpreted. For example, egg producers housing hens in extensive systems in Scotland and Northern Ireland must provide hens with aerial perches, whereas in England and Wales they do not. Aerial perches may be implicated in bone fracture injuries. 4. This paper reviews the prevalence of bone fractures in the egg-laying sector of the poultry industry and the literature on perches. It also explores how bone fractures may be occurring. 5. We propose some means of reducing bone fracture, namely through improved housing designs and genetic selection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens.

              Production performance and egg quality were compared between 4 strains of beak-trimmed layers: 3 commercial strains-Lohmann White (LW), H&N White (HN), Lohmann Brown (LB)-and a noncommercial cross between Rhode Island Red (male) and Barred Plymouth Rock (female) in conventional cages and in floor pens. All chicks were reared and 857 pullets were housed at 18 wk of age in their respective environments. Body weight, hen-day egg production, feed consumption and efficiency, and egg quality were measured at wk 20, 30, 40, and 50. In floor pens, the location of eggs was recorded for 4 consecutive days at 4-wk intervals between 20 and 50 wk of age. Eggs from cages, nest-boxes, and the floor were tested for Escherichia coli and coliform contamination at 38 and 42 wk of age. Mortality was recorded during the rearing and laying periods. Housing systems significantly influenced BW and mortality but not feed consumption or feed efficiency. The interaction between environment and strain was significant for hen-day egg production at wk 20 to 30 and for BW at wk 30, 40, and 50. Hens in floor pens had greater BW, egg and yolk weights, and yolk color than those in cages. Commercial hens produced more eggs than the cross hens. Overall, HN hens had the best production performance, whereas cross hens had better egg quality. In floor pens, LW and HN hens laid most of their eggs in nest boxes, whereas LB and cross hens laid half of their eggs on the floor. Eggs from cages had lower E. coli and coliform contamination than those from nest-boxes and the floor, and E. coli contamination was greater for LB eggs than for LW eggs. Significant strain differences were found for the use of nest-boxes, with a high percentage of floor eggs for brown egg strains. This study suggests that genotype x environment interactions should be considered when alternative housing systems are proposed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Poult Sci
                Poult Sci
                Poultry Science
                Elsevier
                0032-5791
                1525-3171
                26 April 2020
                July 2020
                26 April 2020
                : 99
                : 7
                : 3328-3333
                Affiliations
                []University of Nebraska, Department of Animal Science, Lincoln, NE 68583
                []University of Nebraska, Department of Statistics, Lincoln, NE 68583
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding author: spurdum2@ 123456unl.edu
                Article
                S0032-5791(20)30232-7
                10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.056
                7597846
                32616226
                5a8eb1fc-cfc6-4dd4-8a7c-1de567c33b5b
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 December 2019
                : 26 March 2020
                Categories
                Animal Well-Being and Behavior

                laying hens,aviary systems,perch use
                laying hens, aviary systems, perch use

                Comments

                Comment on this article