4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      WEB Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical and Anatomic Results in the French Observatory

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

          Flow disruption with the WEB device is a new technique for the endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. To obtain precise data regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment with high-quality methodology, the prospective French Observatory study was conducted. Analysis of these data is presented, including 1-year follow-up.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS:

          Patients with bifurcation aneurysms for which WEB treatment was indicated were included in this prospective, multicenter Good Clinical Practice study. Clinical data, including adverse events and clinical status at 1 month and 1 year, were collected and independently analyzed by a medical monitor. An independent core laboratory evaluated the anatomic results at 1 year following the procedure.

          RESULTS:

          Ten French neurointerventional centers included 62 patients (39 women), 33–74 years of age (mean, 56.6 ± 9.80 years) with 63 aneurysms. Aneurysm locations were the middle cerebral artery in 32 aneurysms (50.8%), anterior communicating artery in 16 (25.4%), basilar artery in 9 (14.3%), and internal carotid artery terminus in 6 (9.5%). Morbidity and mortality at 1 month were, respectively, 3.2% (2/62 patients) and 0.0% (0/62). Morbidity and mortality (unrelated to the treatment) at 1 year were, respectively, 0.0% (0/59) and 3.4% (2/59 patients). At 1 year, complete occlusion was observed in 30/58 aneurysms (51.7%); neck remnant, in 16/58 aneurysms (27.6%); and aneurysm remnant, in 12/58 aneurysms (20.7%).

          CONCLUSIONS:

          This prospective French Observatory study showed very good safety of aneurysm treatment with the WEB, with a high rate of adequate aneurysm occlusion at 1 year (79.3%).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          ajnr
          ajnr
          AJNR
          AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
          American Society of Neuroradiology
          0195-6108
          1936-959X
          April 2016
          : 37
          : 4
          : 655-659
          Affiliations
          [1] aFrom the Department of Neuroradiology (L.P.), Hôpital Maison-Blanche, Université Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
          [2] bHôpital Beaujon, (J.M., L.S.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
          [3] cCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon (F.T.), Lyon, France
          [4] dCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (D.H.), Tours, France
          [5] eCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (H.R., J.-Y.G.), Rennes, France
          [6] fCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (X.B.), Bordeaux, France
          [7] gCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers (S.V.), Poitiers, France
          [8] hCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (H.D.), Nantes, France
          [9] iCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (A.-C.J., C.C.), Toulouse, France
          [10] jCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen (P.C.), Caen, France
          [11] kOxford Neurovascular and Neuroradiology Research Unit (A.M., J.B.), Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
          Author notes
          Please address correspondence to Laurent Pierot, MD, PhD, Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Maison-Blanche, 45, Rue Cognacq-Jay 51092 Reims Cedex; e-mail: lpierot@ 123456gmail.com
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2523-4909
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2086-2973
          http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-2320
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4533-4296
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-3309
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-1484
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-487X
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4665-1461
          http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-6386
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6337-4208
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8057-6004
          http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4287-2627
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8757-9021
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-3000
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-8528
          Article
          PMC7960156 PMC7960156 7960156 15-00591
          10.3174/ajnr.A4578
          7960156
          26514608
          5a92e5ce-cc90-4022-8eb0-2204fc4de907
          © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
          History
          : 15 June 2015
          : 30 July 2015
          Categories
          Interventional
          Adult Brain

          Comments

          Comment on this article