16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognostic significance of lymphatic invasion in lymph node-positive breast carcinoma: findings from a large case series with long-term follow-up using immunohistochemical endothelial marker.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The poor prognostic significance of lymphatic invasion (LI) in breast carcinoma (BC) as a whole and in lymph node (LN)-negative patients in particular has been recognized in several studies; however, its prognostic role in LN-positive patients is still questionable. Aim of the current study was to assess prognostic role of LI in LN-positive BC specimens. Sections from non-selected 557 LN-positive BC specimens were stained with antibody to podoplanin/D2-40. LI was identified and correlated with clinicopathological features and patients' outcome. Twenty-year overall survival (OS), disease-free interval (DFI), and development of distant metastasis (DM) or recurrence were known for all patients. LI was detected in 262/557 (47%) of specimens ranging from 1 to 350 lesion per tumor section. Its presence was associated with higher grade tumors (P<0.0001), negative hormonal receptors (P<0.0001), high HER-2 expression (P=0.006), and with increased number of positive LNs (P=0.019). In the whole LN-positive BC, presence of LI was a poor prognostic factor for OS, DFI, and development of DM both in univariate and in multivariate analysis. In further stratification of patients, LI was associated with poorer prognosis in patients with single positive LN and not in patients with >1 positive LN. In T1N1 stage, LI was highly associated with poor OS (P=0.002), DFI (P<0.0001), and DM (P<0.0001). In T2N1 patients, LI was associated only with poorer DFI (P=0.037) but not with death or DM. In the two former patient groups, LI lost significance in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, LI is a poor prognostic factor in LN-positive BC particularly for patients having single positive LN. LI therefore would add further prognostic significance when considered in treatment in those patients. We recommend incorporation of LI in breast carcinoma staging and in prognostic indices.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Mod. Pathol.
          Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
          Springer Nature
          1530-0285
          0893-3952
          Dec 2014
          : 27
          : 12
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
          [2 ] Department of Histopathology, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
          [3 ] Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK.
          [4 ] Department of Histopathology, University of Nottingham, University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK.
          Article
          modpathol201460
          10.1038/modpathol.2014.60
          24762542
          5a98162d-759c-490f-a76e-91ea4c6c7108
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article