22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Vessel co-option mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in liver metastases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors in cancer is limited by resistance mechanisms that are poorly understood. Notably, instead of inducing angiogenesis, some cancers vascularize by the non-angiogenic mechanism of vessel co-option. Here we show that vessel co-option is associated with a poor response to the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Moreover, we find that vessel co-option prevails in human breast cancer liver metastases, a setting where results with anti-angiogenic therapy have been disappointing. In our preclinical mechanistic studies, we show that cancer cell motility mediated by the Arp2/3 complex is required for vessel co-option in liver metastases in vivo and that combined inhibition of angiogenesis and vessel co-option is more effective than inhibiting angiogenesis alone in this setting. Vessel co-option is therefore a clinically relevant mechanism of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy and combined inhibition of angiogenesis and vessel co-option may be a warranted therapeutic strategy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Serpins promote cancer cell survival and vascular co-option in brain metastasis.

            Brain metastasis is an ominous complication of cancer, yet most cancer cells that infiltrate the brain die of unknown causes. Here, we identify plasmin from the reactive brain stroma as a defense against metastatic invasion, and plasminogen activator (PA) inhibitory serpins in cancer cells as a shield against this defense. Plasmin suppresses brain metastasis in two ways: by converting membrane-bound astrocytic FasL into a paracrine death signal for cancer cells, and by inactivating the axon pathfinding molecule L1CAM, which metastatic cells express for spreading along brain capillaries and for metastatic outgrowth. Brain metastatic cells from lung cancer and breast cancer express high levels of anti-PA serpins, including neuroserpin and serpin B2, to prevent plasmin generation and its metastasis-suppressive effects. By protecting cancer cells from death signals and fostering vascular co-option, anti-PA serpins provide a unifying mechanism for the initiation of brain metastasis in lung and breast cancers. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Antiangiogenic therapy in oncology: current status and future directions.

              Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, has been validated as a target in several tumour types through randomised trials, incorporating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway inhibitors into the therapeutic armoury. Although some tumours such as renal cell carcinoma, ovarian and cervical cancers, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are sensitive to these drugs, others such as prostate cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and melanoma are resistant. Even when drugs have yielded significant results, improvements in progression-free survival, and, in some cases, overall survival, are modest. Thus, a crucial issue in development of these drugs is the search for predictive biomarkers-tests that predict which patients will, and will not, benefit before initiation of therapy. Development of biomarkers is important because of the need to balance efficacy, toxicity, and cost. Novel combinations of these drugs with other antiangiogenics or other classes of drugs are being developed, and the appreciation that these drugs have immunomodulatory and other modes of action will lead to combination regimens that capitalise on these newly understood mechanisms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9502015
                8791
                Nat Med
                Nat. Med.
                Nature medicine
                1078-8956
                1546-170X
                27 October 2016
                17 October 2016
                November 2016
                17 April 2017
                : 22
                : 11
                : 1294-1302
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Tumour Biology Team, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
                [2 ]The Royal Marsden, London, UK
                [3 ]McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital - Glen Site, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [4 ]Translational Cancer Research Unit, Gasthuis Zusters Antwerpen Hospitals St. Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
                [5 ]Breast Cancer Now Histopathology Core Facility, The Royal Marsden, London, UK
                [6 ]Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [7 ]Breast Cancer Now Unit, Guy's Hospital, King's College London School of Medicine, London, UK
                [8 ]Cancer Genomics Center-Hubrecht Institute-Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences & University Medical Centre Utrecht, Uppsalalaan 8, Utrecht 3584CT, Netherlands
                [9 ]Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden
                [10 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                Author notes
                Lead correspondong author: Andrew Reynolds, andrew.reynolds@ 123456icr.ac.uk
                Co-corresponding authors: Peter Metrakos, peter.metrakos@ 123456mcgill.ca , David Cunningham, David.Cunningham@ 123456rmh.nhs.uk
                [12]

                Co-senior authors.

                Article
                EMS69950
                10.1038/nm.4197
                5104270
                27748747
                5aa8a353-1693-4a47-9e42-0388dbff0876

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article